1990
DOI: 10.1159/000110748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-Control Study of Neuroepithelial Tumors in Rochester, Minnesota, 1950–1977

Abstract: Rochester, Minnesota, has over many decades the highest reported incidence rates of primary intracranial neoplasms. This occurs in the absence of any readily identifiable risk factors. A case-control study of neuroepithelial tumors has been undertaken utilizing the records-linkage system at the Mayo Clinic. This study failed to yield any significant findings for the factors examined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intracranial meningioma incidence increases with patient age, ranging from 0.3 per 100,000 in childhood to 8.4 per 100,000 in the elderly, accounting for near 30% of incidental tumors found at autopsy [30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intracranial meningioma incidence increases with patient age, ranging from 0.3 per 100,000 in childhood to 8.4 per 100,000 in the elderly, accounting for near 30% of incidental tumors found at autopsy [30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case-control studies that compared controls with adult glioma patients who had a history of head injury requiring medical attention found no evidence of an association (ORs range from 0.7 to 1.3; Wrensch et al, 2000b). Somewhat higher relative risks have been reported when any head injuries are considered (Ahlbom et al, 1986;Burch et al, 1987;Choi et al, 1970;Codd et al, 1990;Preston-Martin et al, 1989;Ryan et al, 1992;Schlehofer et al, 1992), suggesting the possibility that cases may have been more likely to recall minor head injuries than controls. There has been more evidence of a possible link between head injuries and meningiomas or other brain tumors, such as acoustic neuromas (Inskip et al, 1995, Preston-Martin andMack, 1996), but casecontrol reporting differences might explain the ndings.…”
Section: Trauma and Head Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case-control studies that compared controls with adult glioma patients who had a history of head injury requiring medical attention found no evidence of an association (ORs range from 0.7 to 1.3; Wrensch et al, 2000b). Somewhat higher relative risks have been reported when any head injuries are considered (Ahlbom et al, 1986;Burch et al, 1987;Choi et al, 1970;Codd et al, 1990;Preston-Martin et al, 1989;Ryan et al, 1992;Schlehofer et al, 1992), suggesting the possibility that cases may have been more likely to recall minor head injuries than controls. There has been more evidence of a possible link between head injuries and meningiomas or other brain tumors, such as acoustic neuromas (Inskip et al, 1995, Preston-Martin andMack, 1996), but casecontrol reporting differences might explain the ndings.…”
Section: Trauma and Head Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%