Case study: developing campus spaces through co-creation

Lundström, Anette; Savolainen, Jussi; Kostiainen, Emma

doi:10.1080/17452007.2016.1208077

Cited by 26 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There has also been discussed, not least sparked by the book 'Quiet' (Cain, 2012) there is criticism towards thinking that creativity is only being nurtured by social encounters and team building (Bilton, 2007;Hennessey and Amabile, 2010;. Creative workspaces based on teams and community-building through office design contain the premise 'all together, altogether better', which has largely been contested by Dale and Burrell (2010) The co-construction of organizational efforts, such as space construction together with employees, has been noted as important for better outcomes in several studies (e.g., Emmitt & Ruikar, 2013;Lundström, Savolainen, & Kostiainen, 2016;Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004). The co-construction of workspaces has been particularly emphasized by Doorley and Witthoft (2012), who have experimented with space and their own creativity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’

Paoli

Sauer²,

Ropo

2017

Journal of Management & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines office design as a spatial context of organizations. Organizations increasingly invest in designing workspaces to support employee creativity, foster company innovation and communicate a positive company image. This paper takes a critical view of this ‘hype’ by describing and analysing images of the headquarters of allegedly ‘creative workspaces’ published on the internet across a broad range of industries and corporations. Our analysis shows how their design follows standardized or stereotypical approaches to nurturing creativity: playfully or artistically designed open spaces, environments reminiscent of home, sports and play, nature, past/future technologies, or culturally aligned symbols. We discern underlying connections between office spaces and creativity, suggesting that creativity flourishes in happy, relaxed and playful communities within close-knit teams. We then identify three contradictions in relation to the existing literature on creativity and workspaces: individually versus collectively produced creativity; professionally designed workspaces versus workspaces created through participation; and planned versus emerging creativity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’

Paoli

Sauer²,

Ropo

2017

Journal of Management & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Certain studies do however highlight specific initiatives e.g. co-designing the facilities through participative design (Lundström, Savolainen, & Kostiainen, 2016), and encouraging students to submit recipe ideas as a way to promote their affective and practical engagement (cf. Feldman, Hartwell, & Brusca, 2013;Francisco, 2006).…”

Section: Campus Foodservice As Co-work Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Campus foodservice experiences and student wellbeing: An integrative review for design and service interventions

Lugosi

2019

International Journal of Hospitality Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Please consult the published version if citing. Highlights  Reviews multidisciplinary work on eating at/in university and on student wellbeing.  Contends that foodservice provision enhances students' university experiences.  Identifies links between on-campus foodservice experiences and student wellbeing.  Expands focus with co-workspace, restorative servicescape and hospitality literature.  Offers recommendations for research, design and service-led interventions.

show abstract

“…Finally, the role of users is identified as important in the delivery of optimised sustainability performance. Integrating users within the project process as well as the need to integrate facilities within construction supply chains is addressed [55], [63], [66].…”

Section: Systems Management and Supply Chain Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%