2017 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icccnt.2017.8203996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Casting online votes: To predict offline results using sentiment analysis by machine learning classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] have shown that SVM with Normalized Poly Kernel achieved the best performance compared to other kernels. However, in other studies [9] [17], SVM with ordinary kernels, linear and RBF kernel, showed less effective performance than other algorithms. It is because a key success factor in SVM is the choice of kernel function.…”
Section: Sentiment Of the Economic And General Aspects In World Cloudmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[25] have shown that SVM with Normalized Poly Kernel achieved the best performance compared to other kernels. However, in other studies [9] [17], SVM with ordinary kernels, linear and RBF kernel, showed less effective performance than other algorithms. It is because a key success factor in SVM is the choice of kernel function.…”
Section: Sentiment Of the Economic And General Aspects In World Cloudmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…CRFs, used by 4 studies [228,238,200,199], are a type of discriminative classifier that model the decision boundary amongst different classes, whereas LiR was also used by 4 studies [194,241,232,239]. Moreover, 3 studies each used the SANT [78,75,239] and SGD [227,244,240] algorithms, with the former being mostly used for comparison purposes to the proposed approaches by the respective authors.…”
Section: Algorithm Number Of Studies Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Politics domain is the dominant application area with 45 studies applying social opinion mining on different events, namely elections [453,103,197,50,121,87,88,157,53,327,244,539,421,422,337,203,168,368,442,222,520,178,212,184,117,511,190,441,310,406,82], reforms, such as equality marriage [130], debates [180], referendums [241,540], political parties or politicians [60,111,466], and political events, such as terrorism, protests, uprisings and riots [420,437,330,556,205,248,188].…”
Section: Application Areas Of Social Opinion Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trabajos publicados en relación a algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina, análisis de sentimientos y redes sociales fueron publicados en [16] y [17], donde se clasifican los datos de Twitter en polaridad de sentimientos utilizando diferentes clasificadores de aprendizaje supervisado. Se concluye que los resultados son buenos, aunque aún hay problemas no triviales como el sesgo de la muestra y la comprensión automática del contenido textual.…”
Section: Análisis De Sentimientos Y Otras Técnicas De Predicciónunclassified