1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1965.tb01826.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catabolism and Distribution of Serum‐albumin in the Dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus in dogs, Wetterfors (1965) found by the two procedures EV/V ratios of 1·1 (0·8-1·2) and 1·4 (1,1-1,8), respectively. In a series of twenty humans, Beeken, Volwiler, Goldsworthy, Garby, Reynolds, Stogsdill & Stemler (1962) obtained a ratio of 1·3 (0'9-1'7) by the first method and 1·8 (1·2-2·8) by the second method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus in dogs, Wetterfors (1965) found by the two procedures EV/V ratios of 1·1 (0·8-1·2) and 1·4 (1,1-1,8), respectively. In a series of twenty humans, Beeken, Volwiler, Goldsworthy, Garby, Reynolds, Stogsdill & Stemler (1962) obtained a ratio of 1·3 (0'9-1'7) by the first method and 1·8 (1·2-2·8) by the second method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The literature is listed in the reviews of Rothschild, Oratz & Schreiber (1969), Wetterfors (1965a), and the text of Schultze & Heremans (1966). The investigations were often incomplete and the results conflicting.…”
Section: Extravascular Albumin Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The albumin content of muscle is reported to be 3·1 mgjg, a value in reasonable agreement with our own. Wetterfors (1965b), using a double isotope procedure, determined the albumin content of several tissues of dogs 5-8 days after injection. The muscles contained 3-4 mgjg and the gastrointestinal tract 7-10 mgjg, values very similar to our findings in rats.…”
Section: Extravascular Albumin Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As so far data on the relationship between LBM and indicators of albumin distribution and meta bolism are lacking, we decided to answer the question whether LBM is a K udli£ ka/R ath better reference standard for albumin metabolism than hitherto used reference units, i.e. body weight, height or body surface [1][2][3]. In the present paper we are presenting the first results of this investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%