2015
DOI: 10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalpa Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the evaluation is left to the user to analyse. Information quality 4,10,16,19 Quality of argumentation 10,16 Factuality 10,16,20 Quality of the language Information/data integrity 12 Expression of first-hand experience (anecdotes) 3 Presentation errors 7 Believability 6, 10, 16 Accuracy 1,10,16 Coherence/internal consistency 5 Freedom from bias, objectivity 6,13 Informativeness, depth 10 Authenticity 9 Currency, relevance 1,4,10,15 In the first place, although it is an intuitive concept, credibility is not a simple construct. Traditionally, in information and library science credibility is seen in relation to retrieval and the preservation of information.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Credibility In Information Science: Mapping Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the evaluation is left to the user to analyse. Information quality 4,10,16,19 Quality of argumentation 10,16 Factuality 10,16,20 Quality of the language Information/data integrity 12 Expression of first-hand experience (anecdotes) 3 Presentation errors 7 Believability 6, 10, 16 Accuracy 1,10,16 Coherence/internal consistency 5 Freedom from bias, objectivity 6,13 Informativeness, depth 10 Authenticity 9 Currency, relevance 1,4,10,15 In the first place, although it is an intuitive concept, credibility is not a simple construct. Traditionally, in information and library science credibility is seen in relation to retrieval and the preservation of information.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Credibility In Information Science: Mapping Thmentioning
confidence: 99%