2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic activity evaluation of mesoporous α-GaOOH microspheres self-assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, the bandgap energy of gallium oxyhydroxide, determined by UV-vis spectroscopy, is between 4.75 and 5.06 eV; whereas for gallium oxide spans from 4.8 to 4.9 eV. [29][30][31][32][33] In this work, the bandgap energy value obtained for GaOOH and α-Ga 2 O 3 was the same for both compounds (5 eV) and is consistent with the literature (Figure 6). A gallium oxide sample taken after the degradation of malachite green was analyzed, and a slight reduction of the bandgap energy to 4.5 eV was measured (Figure 6c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to the literature, the bandgap energy of gallium oxyhydroxide, determined by UV-vis spectroscopy, is between 4.75 and 5.06 eV; whereas for gallium oxide spans from 4.8 to 4.9 eV. [29][30][31][32][33] In this work, the bandgap energy value obtained for GaOOH and α-Ga 2 O 3 was the same for both compounds (5 eV) and is consistent with the literature (Figure 6). A gallium oxide sample taken after the degradation of malachite green was analyzed, and a slight reduction of the bandgap energy to 4.5 eV was measured (Figure 6c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%