2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic role of different pore systems in MCM-49 zeolite for liquid alkylation of benzene with ethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through investigating the activity of different pore systems (surface pockets, supercages and sinusoidal pores) of MCM-49 zeolite in this reaction, our group found that the coke deposition in the supercages is responsible for the fast deactivation at an early stage of reaction [4]. It is expected that the reaction stability may be improved by introducing uniform intracrystalline mesopores into MCM-49 zeolite.…”
Section: Improved Catalytic Performance Of Hierarchical Mcm-49 Zeolitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Through investigating the activity of different pore systems (surface pockets, supercages and sinusoidal pores) of MCM-49 zeolite in this reaction, our group found that the coke deposition in the supercages is responsible for the fast deactivation at an early stage of reaction [4]. It is expected that the reaction stability may be improved by introducing uniform intracrystalline mesopores into MCM-49 zeolite.…”
Section: Improved Catalytic Performance Of Hierarchical Mcm-49 Zeolitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…30% and the intralayer sinusoidal 10 MR channels for c.a. 10% [4]. Additionally, only the interlayer supercages experience a quick deactivation due to coke deposition, while both of the surface pockets and intralayer sinusoidal 10 MR channels exhibit good reaction stability [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differing from H‐Beta 26, the conversions of PDO and BDO over the treated H‐ZSM‐5 28 only decreased by 12.0% and 8.8%, respectively (Supporting Information Figure S6). Because DMQ cannot enter the 10‐membered‐ring micropores of ZSM‐5 zeolites due to its large size . When quinoline (smaller molecules) was added, the activity of H‐ZSM‐5 28 nearly disappeared (Supporting Information Figure S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external surface acid site concentration of MCM-22 or MCM-49 zeolite could be estimated by selective poisoning with 2,4-DMQ [22,26,[35][36][37][38][39]. It was well accepted that only Brönsted acid sites could be poisoned by 2,4-DMQ but not for Lewis acid sites, due to the steric hindrance between the latter and the 2-position methyl group of 2,4-DMQ molecule [22,26].…”
Section: Contribution Of Brönsted Acid Sites To Acylation Of An With mentioning
confidence: 99%