Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of rural policies in Hungary and Poland

Augustyn, Anna; Nemes, Gusztáv

doi:10.7896/j.1419

Cited by 19 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other factors inhibit also the programme's implementation: political infl uence, which is exacerbated by weak administrative networks, the antipathy to formal institutions refl ected in the partnership process and a lack of initiative, as well as the programme's complexity (Marquart et al, 2012;Chevalier und Maurel, 2013). Despite these obstacles, there have also been good experiences and progress in implementing LEADER in CEE countries contributing to a 'catching up' process in rural development (Augustyn and Nemes, 2014).…”

Section: Experiences With Leader In Cee Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – refl ecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context

Oedl-Wieser¹,

Dax²,

Fischer³

2017

Stud. Agr. Econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Experiences With Leader In Cee Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – refl ecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context

Oedl-Wieser¹,

Dax²,

Fischer³

2017

Stud. Agr. Econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The impact of such processes has been interpreted and discussed in terms of institutional reforms (Perger 2010a(Perger , 2010bMezei 2013;Augustyn and Nemes 2014) and the spatial distribution of funds (NFH 2006;Lukovics and Lóránd 2010;Pannon, Hétfa and Budapest Int. 2013;Fertő and Varga 2014).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policyin Hungarian Rural Regions

Perger

2016

Eastern European Countryside

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper is based on the preliminary results of an ongoing research programme supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund. The objective of the research is to find out how local actors react to the changing development policy context, how it shapes the local practices of local agents, and how such interactions influence local society and the development of rural micro-regions. The main pillars of the study are subject-oriented case-studies in two rural microregions. The pilot regions are very similar in terms of geographical location, natural resources, population, territory, settlement structure and economicsocial status, yet they have followed a very different development track, mainly due to the different local reactions to the changing state development policy. Our research demonstrates that the key factor of local success is multi-level (settlement, micro-region) cooperation between various (public, private and civil) local stakeholders. The crucial demand for a main facilitator of local cooperation could be satisfied by the local government, provided that it is able to adapt to the frequent changes leading to the emergence of new social networks. No evidence is found to indicate the existence of a 'project class' within the local rural societies assuming an intermediary role between decision makers and

show abstract

“…En la mayor parte de estos trabajos también se advierte la ausencia de implicación y/o participación real de los ciudadanos (Plaza, 2005;Böcher, 2008;Dargan y Shucksmith, 2008;Buciega, 2012;Esparcia, 2014;Esparcia y Escribano, 2012: 237;Augustyn y Nemes, 2014;Martínez et al, 2015;Bosworth et al, 2016), y el reforzamiento de las estructuras de poder a favor de determinados lobbies económicos y políticos en detrimento de determinados grupos sociales que quedan marginados de ellas (Osti, 2000;Shortall, 2008;Nardone et al, 2010;Gardner, 2011;y Navarro et al, 2014), incluso en términos de género en relación con el empoderamiento de la mujer y de la gobernanza, especialmente en los territorios del rural profundo y montano (Cassellas et al, 2013), en el que la progresiva y mayor educación y formación les está permitiendo asumir retos y proyectos innovadores en el contexto del mundo rural. Dicho de otro modo, "la postura que apoya que la educación y la formación fueron para las mujeres rurales un elemento de desarraigo y desapego del medio rural y, en definitiva, de abandono del mismo 5 , ahora se revierte porque precisamente la educación y la formación se convierten en factores indispensables para construir las nuevas identidades rurales femeninas" (Porto et al, 2015: 403).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

¿Desarrollo rural o desarrollo de territorios rurales dinámicos? La contribución a los desequilibrios territoriales por parte de los programas de desarrollo en el sur de España, Andalucía

Pérez¹,

García²,

Valverde³

2017

An. Geogr. Univ. Complut.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen. Los efectos territoriales que han tenido los Programas de Desarrollo Rural en el sur de Europa, concretamente en la región de Andalucía (España), han sido variados. Partiendo del máximo nivel de desagregación de los proyectos ejecutados en el marco de la iniciativas LEADER y PRODER se realiza un análisis de un conjunto de variables sintéticas a nivel de proyecto, municipio y grupo de desarrollo rural con el objeto de evaluar hasta qué grado dichos programas han coadyuvado al desarrollo de las zonas más desfavorecidas de la región, o por el contrario han incrementado las diferencias preexistentes. La investigación realizada ha permitido constatar como en Andalucía la mayor parte de las iniciativas se han concentrado en las zonas más dinámicas, las más pobladas, en las que existía un tejido empresarial que ha sido capaz de aprovechar el acceso a la financiación europea, lo que ha reforzado su papel de liderazgo frente a las zonas más deprimidas con escaso capital social y empresarial. Palabras clave: Andalucía; Desarrollo Rural; Desequilibrio Territorial.[en] Rural development or development of dynamic rural territories? The contribution to territorial imbalances by the Development Programas in southern Spain, Andalusia Abstract. The territorial effects that have the Rural Development Programmes in Southern Europe, in the region of Andalusia (Spain) have been varied. Based on the maximum level of disaggregation of the approved projects under the LEADER and PRODER initiatives, it has been analized a set of synthetic variables at the project level, municipalities and local action groups in order to assess to what extent haveEste trabajo se ha realizado en el marco del proyecto de investigación "Programas de desarrollo y cambio rural en la Unión Europea: gobernanza, resultados y lecciones a compartir 2007-13" financiado por el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad español dentro de su Programa de Excelencia, CSO2014-56223-P. Cañete, J.A..; Navarro, F. An. geogr. Univ. Complut. 37(1) 2017: 265-295 performed such programmes to the development of the most disadvantaged areas of the region, or in the opposite way, have increased the pre)existing differences.The investigation has revealed in the region of Andalusia that most of the initiatives have focused on the most dynamic areas, the most populated, in which there was a business sector that has been able to take advantage of access to european funding, which has reinforced its leadership role against the most depressed areas with little social and business capital.

show abstract

Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of rural policies in Hungary and Poland

Cited by 19 publications

References 14 publications

A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – refl ecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context

A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – refl ecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context

Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policyin Hungarian Rural Regions

¿Desarrollo rural o desarrollo de territorios rurales dinámicos? La contribución a los desequilibrios territoriales por parte de los programas de desarrollo en el sur de España, Andalucía

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About