Proceedings New Trends and Research Challenges in Pedagogy and Andragogy Ntrcpa18 2018
DOI: 10.24917/9788394156893.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Observation System of Humanistic Andragogical Work of an Adult Educator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the level of EC in trainers and trainees, the questionnaire by Pavlov and Skúpa (2018) was used, with 43 items in total and a 7-point scale (1 -I do not agree at all, 7 -I absolutely agree), measuring 10 dimensions (see above) in addition to the total score, with uneven representation of related statements (Table 1). Th e value of internal consistency for the whole questionnaire was 0.971 (Cronbach Alpha), indicating high stability of measurement.…”
Section: Methods Of Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the level of EC in trainers and trainees, the questionnaire by Pavlov and Skúpa (2018) was used, with 43 items in total and a 7-point scale (1 -I do not agree at all, 7 -I absolutely agree), measuring 10 dimensions (see above) in addition to the total score, with uneven representation of related statements (Table 1). Th e value of internal consistency for the whole questionnaire was 0.971 (Cronbach Alpha), indicating high stability of measurement.…”
Section: Methods Of Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e same was measured also in trainers of other adult professional training and participants of that type of education. Research involved 262 participants, and ethical competencies were measured using the Questionnaire of Trainers' Ethical-Humanistic Manifestations by Pavlov and Skúpa (2018). It was found out that the overall level of ethical competencies was high above-average and comparable in both groups of trainers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%