2017
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.251.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categories for Dynamic Epistemic Logic

Abstract: The primary goal of this paper is to recast the semantics of modal logic, and dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) in particular, in category-theoretic terms. We first review the category of relations and categories of Kripke frames, with particular emphasis on the duality between relations and adjoint homomorphisms. Using these categories, we then reformulate the semantics of DEL in a more categorical and algebraic form. Several virtues of the new formulation will be demonstrated: The DEL idea of updating a model in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are already several categorical reformulation and generalisation of DEL in the literature, e.g. see [17,12], but most of them are based on relational semantics, while our approach applies to arbitrary topological categories. We first define the notion of a product type, which generalises event models: Definition 5.2 (Product Type).…”
Section: Modal Strength Group Knowledge and Fibre Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already several categorical reformulation and generalisation of DEL in the literature, e.g. see [17,12], but most of them are based on relational semantics, while our approach applies to arbitrary topological categories. We first define the notion of a product type, which generalises event models: Definition 5.2 (Product Type).…”
Section: Modal Strength Group Knowledge and Fibre Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the categorical reformulation of MTSs, in [9,13], Cîrstea and Sadrzadeh give a coalgebraic model of modal logic for actions and agents. They take T X = P κ (X) E × (1 + X) A × ℘(P), where κ is a regular cardinal, as the coalgebra functor (over Set).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 focuses on capturing this indexing mechanism by Fam construction. Categorical semantics of DEL in [9,13,14] does not have such indexing systems. On the other hand, the first author extends index update functions (t α component of MTS) to relations in [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%