“…Previous literature in marketing and operations management has looked at captainship arrangements where duties focus on (i) price‐related decisions such as pricing and promotional schedules (Kurtuluş & Toktay, 2005; Nijs et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2003), (ii) assortment decisions (Alan et al., 2017; Kurtuluş & Nakkas, 2011; Kurtuluş et al., 2014; Nakkas et al., 2020; Viswanathan et al., 2021), or (iii) nonprice demand‐enhancing decisions such as the allocation of promotional shelf space and shelf organization (Kurtuluş et al., 2014; Kurtuluş & Toktay, 2011; Özer et al., 2018; Subramanian et al., 2010; Wright, 2009). The findings provide evidence that retailers can benefit from captainship arrangements despite concerns about captain' s opportunism and rival suppliers' push‐back (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2009; Gooner et al., 2011; Gruen & Shah, 2000; Lindblom & Olkkonen, 2006; Morgan et al., 2007; Özer et al., 2018; Subramanian et al., 2010).…”