1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.61.2627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catelan, Lucchin, and Matarrese Reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
228
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
228
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general the PT expansion is more complicated because the solutions at each order become non-separable functions of τ and k [91,93,46,118]. In particular the growing mode at order n does not scale as D n 1 (τ ) (or a n (τ ) as in Eq.…”
Section: Cosmology Dependence Of Non-linear Growth Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general the PT expansion is more complicated because the solutions at each order become non-separable functions of τ and k [91,93,46,118]. In particular the growing mode at order n does not scale as D n 1 (τ ) (or a n (τ ) as in Eq.…”
Section: Cosmology Dependence Of Non-linear Growth Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed calculations can be found in [46]. Different approaches have been used in the literature to do such calculations [105,118,93]. The direct calculation appears to be the most secure, if not the rapid or most instructive.…”
Section: The Density and Velocity Fields Up To Third Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Einstein-de Sitter assumption is needed to avoid more complicated time dependence of P 13 and P 22 , but the real Universe is of course not Einstein-de Sitter. Fortunately, this is not a significant problem because, to percent level accuracy [28,60,61,62,63,64,65,66], the effect of changing the background model can be included by simply using the correct linear growth factor in Eq. (8).…”
Section: B Standard Eulerian Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complicated non-Gaussian character of the F process can considerably complicate the calculations with respect to the linear theory case. In particular, an analytical approach based on the peaks of the F process (such as the confluent formalism of Manrique & Salvador-Solé (1995)) is essentially hopeless: an analytical description of the peaks of a random field can be obtained only for Gaussian or closely related fields (see Adler 1981), or for asymptotically high peaks (Catelan, Lucchin & Matarrese 1988). On the other hand, the simpler excursion set approach requires knowledge of only the 1-point PDF of the F process, which has been obtained above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%