2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex cancels out the cost of selective retrieval on subsequent analogical reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced activity in the right dorso-and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex has also been shown to correlate with reduced activity in the hippocampus, as well as with forgetting, which may be understood as an aftereffect of memory inhibition (for a review, see Anderson and Hanslmayr, 2014). Supporting this interpretation, recent results from neuromodulation studies suggest that cathodal transcranial stimulation over the right LPFC disrupts inhibitory control (Silas and Brandt, 2016;Valle et al, 2020).…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Enhanced activity in the right dorso-and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex has also been shown to correlate with reduced activity in the hippocampus, as well as with forgetting, which may be understood as an aftereffect of memory inhibition (for a review, see Anderson and Hanslmayr, 2014). Supporting this interpretation, recent results from neuromodulation studies suggest that cathodal transcranial stimulation over the right LPFC disrupts inhibitory control (Silas and Brandt, 2016;Valle et al, 2020).…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The robust activation in right DLPFC and VLPFC has led to research confirming their causal role in inducing active forgetting. For example, electrical stimulation over right DLPFC or VLPFC via transcranial direct current stimulation prior to retrieval practice abolishes RIF, which is reduced relative to sham stimulation (Penolazzi et al 2014, Stramaccia et al 2017, Valle et al 2020. RIF is abolished even though stimulation leaves retrieval practice success and retrieval-based learning of Retrieval suppression: a controlled attempt to cancel an episodic retrieval when a reminder begins to elicit automatic retrieval of unwelcome content…”
Section: Inhibition Of Competing Memories During Selective Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is well established that the DLPFC is involved in a large number of processes in addition to working memory, including response conflict, presence of distracting information, novelty, selective attention, and perceptual difficulty (Nee & Jonides, 2009;Nee et al, 2007;Duncan & Owen, 2000). In particular, prior work in the context of analogical reasoning (Valle, Bajo, & Gómez-Ariza, 2020;Cho et al, 2010;Bunge et al, 2005) suggests that the DLPFC could also be involved in interference resolution during response selection (Nee et al, 2007). Bunge et al (2005) found the right DLPFC to be insensitive to whether participants were evaluating quadruplets of verbal items for analogical validity versus semantic association, or to the degree of association strength tying the items together, and was instead particularly sensitive to the need to avoid accepting invalid responses.…”
Section: Working Memory: Dlpfcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that further advances in noninvasive neuroimaging techniques capable of high temporal as well as spatial resolution will play a critical role in providing empirical evidence to guide theoretical developments. Techniques such as repetitive TMS (e.g., Boroojerdi et al, 2001) and tDCS (Valle et al, 2020;Green et al, 2017) can be used to test the causal roles of brain regions hypothesized to contribute to relational processing.…”
Section: Open Issues For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%