2020
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.570754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cathode–Sulfide Solid Electrolyte Interfacial Instability: Challenges and Solutions

Abstract: All-solid-state batteries are a candidate for next-generation energy-storage devices due to potential improvements in energy density and safety compared to current battery technologies. Due to their high ionic conductivity and potential scalability through slurry processing routes, sulfide solid-state electrolytes are promising to replace traditional liquid electrolytes and enable All-solid-state batteries, but stability of cathode-sulfide solid-state electrolytes interfaces requires further improvement. Herei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sang 85 When the sulfide electrolyte is in contact with oxide cathode materials, such as LiCoO 2 and nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), interfacial side reactions, large interfacial resistance, and elemental interdiffusion will lead to fast capacity degradation. 86 For example, it has been found that cobalt migrated from the LiCoO 2 cathode to the sulfide electrolyte after initial charging. 87 The main cause of the large interfacial resistance at the cathode/sulfide interface is the space charge layer, which arises from the Li-ion concentration difference between the oxide electrodes and the sulfide electrolyte.…”
Section: Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sang 85 When the sulfide electrolyte is in contact with oxide cathode materials, such as LiCoO 2 and nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), interfacial side reactions, large interfacial resistance, and elemental interdiffusion will lead to fast capacity degradation. 86 For example, it has been found that cobalt migrated from the LiCoO 2 cathode to the sulfide electrolyte after initial charging. 87 The main cause of the large interfacial resistance at the cathode/sulfide interface is the space charge layer, which arises from the Li-ion concentration difference between the oxide electrodes and the sulfide electrolyte.…”
Section: Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the sulfide electrolyte is in contact with oxide cathode materials, such as LiCoO 2 and nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), interfacial side reactions, large interfacial resistance, and elemental interdiffusion will lead to fast capacity degradation 86 . For example, it has been found that cobalt migrated from the LiCoO 2 cathode to the sulfide electrolyte after initial charging 87 .…”
Section: Ceramic Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36] One key issue is the reactivity between the sulfides and both electrodes, which leads to an impedance rise associated with the formation of a mixed conducting interphase (MCI). [23,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] The interface between the metal anode and the SE should be either thermodynamically stable or be passivated to be kinetically stable. Sulfide SEs are not thermodynamically stable at 0 V versus Li/Li + , forming either MCI or a (partially) kinetically stabilized solid electrolyte interphase (SEI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While design and construction of solid-state composite cathodes have been dominant in SSB research (Figure a), it is necessary to critically evaluate the compatibility of this design approach with fast charging. At higher charging rates, chemo-mechanical challenges including interfacial delamination and particle cracking due to severe volume fluctuations of the active material need to be understood and addressed. Therefore, the relative mechanical compliance of the active material and surrounding matrix of solid electrolyte must be considered under a range of volumetric strain conditions. This mechanical damage can potentially be mitigated by using single crystal cathode particles instead of polycrystalline materials .…”
Section: Challenges For Fast Charge Of Solid-state Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%