1995
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.88.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cathodoluminescence Study of Cd1-xMnxTe and Zn1-xMnxTe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pure CdTe, E0 and Epc energy values agree well within experimental error. The rapid jump of Epc value at RT towards lower energies at about 0.1 eV with the introduction of even small amount of iron (x = 0.01) should be thus associated with the process of absorption from the 5E state of iron to CB, while in pure CdTe, PC seems to be determined by the VB → CB transition [12]. As at RT the slopes of E0 and Epc are, within the experimental error, the same, this suggests that the final state in both processes is CBM since the distance between .VBM and the 5E state remains practically the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For pure CdTe, E0 and Epc energy values agree well within experimental error. The rapid jump of Epc value at RT towards lower energies at about 0.1 eV with the introduction of even small amount of iron (x = 0.01) should be thus associated with the process of absorption from the 5E state of iron to CB, while in pure CdTe, PC seems to be determined by the VB → CB transition [12]. As at RT the slopes of E0 and Epc are, within the experimental error, the same, this suggests that the final state in both processes is CBM since the distance between .VBM and the 5E state remains practically the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This result confirms behavior of a bump appearing below the E0 value in the RE spectra after introduction of iron into the CdTe matrix and appearing of a pre-edge maximum in the α(E) dependence, only at LNT. Since the probability of thermal excitation of electron between VBM and the 5E state of iron is about 4 orders smaller at LNT than at RT, then the PC process seems to be determined by VB --ł CB transitions [12]. It is also worth noting that at LNT the 3 I} excitation state of iron is localized very close to the bottom of conduction band and may act as a holding or recombination trap (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%