2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.597420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal Evaluation of Laboratory Markers in Type 2 Diabetes on Cancer and Vascular Diseases Using Various Mendelian Randomization Tools

Abstract: Multiple studies have demonstrated the effects of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on various human diseases; however, most of these were observational epidemiological studies that suffered from many potential biases including reported confounding and reverse causations. In this article, we investigated whether cancer and vascular disease can be affected by T2D-related traits, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (2h-PG), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, by using Mendelian randomiza… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assumption checks for determining the main analytic tools were done for all 41 regulators. Except for monocyte-specific chemokine 3 (MCP3), monokine induced by interferon gamma (MIG), and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), all cytokines were analyzed using the IVW methodology as the primary analytical method, with no evidence of heterogeneity and no week instruments ( 21 ). For MCP3, MR-Egger (SIMEX) was chosen as the primary approach because the p -values for the Q -tests from IVW and MR-Egger were both below 0.05, and I 2 was lower than 90%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assumption checks for determining the main analytic tools were done for all 41 regulators. Except for monocyte-specific chemokine 3 (MCP3), monokine induced by interferon gamma (MIG), and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), all cytokines were analyzed using the IVW methodology as the primary analytical method, with no evidence of heterogeneity and no week instruments ( 21 ). For MCP3, MR-Egger (SIMEX) was chosen as the primary approach because the p -values for the Q -tests from IVW and MR-Egger were both below 0.05, and I 2 was lower than 90%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity for three cytokines became insignificant once the outliers were removed ( I 2 : 15.1%; Cochrane’s Q p = 0.21; I 2 : 12.8%; Cochrane’s Q p = 0.25; I 2 : 0%; Cochrane’s Q p = 0.48), so IVW was also applicable as the main test. For MCP1, MR-Egger (SIMEX) was implemented as the concluding results with heterogeneity existence, I 2 <90% and InSIDE assumption fulfillment ( 21 ) ( Supplementary Table S5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we performed a MR study to clarify the bidirectional causal association between BMD/fracture and the risk of MS using large-scale publicly available GWAS datasets, as provided in Table 1 . MR has three assumptions: (1) instrumental variables (genetic variants) are strongly associated with an exposure, generally the genome-wide significance ( p <5.00E-08); (2) instrumental variables are independent of confounders; and (3) instrumental variables affect one outcome only via the exposure path ( 24 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed directional horizontal pleiotropy using the MR-PRESSO global test. Therefore, we interpret the results according to the appropriate MR analysis method [43]. p-value < 0.05 for Cochran's Q statistic, Rücker's Q' statistic, and the MR-PRESSO global test indicate possible pleiotropy in the genetic variations.…”
Section: Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%