2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we compared the difference scores at 12-15 Hz EEG relative power among Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz between pre-and posttest sessions. Previous work has shown that the SMR originated in the centro-parietal region (Grosse-Wentrup, Schölkopf, & Hill, 2011). Thus, we hypothesized that the difference score of 12-15 Hz at Cz would be greater than that of the frontal and occipital regions for SMR group participants after training.…”
Section: Within-session Learningmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, we compared the difference scores at 12-15 Hz EEG relative power among Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz between pre-and posttest sessions. Previous work has shown that the SMR originated in the centro-parietal region (Grosse-Wentrup, Schölkopf, & Hill, 2011). Thus, we hypothesized that the difference score of 12-15 Hz at Cz would be greater than that of the frontal and occipital regions for SMR group participants after training.…”
Section: Within-session Learningmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Most of these studies focus on inter-subject variability from a physiological [2][3][4][5][6], anatomical [7,8], or psychological [9,10] perspectives. Although precise distinction between user-related and system-related causes of performance variations may not be simple [11], these studies provide a better understanding of these causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these studies are limited to the analysis of a single session using offline recordings (where no feedback was provided to the subject). For instance, it is suggested that classification certainty for each subject is positively correlated with the power of EEG oscillations in the gamma band (55 − 85 Hz) [3,6]. Similarly, trial-by-trial classification performance was found to correlate with high-frequency gamma oscillations (70 − 80 Hz) prior to the beginning of each trial [15], while others found correlations with a weighted combination of the theta (3 − 8 Hz), alpha (8 − 13 Hz), and beta (16 − 24 Hz) oscillations in frontal, pariatel and central areas of the brain, respectively [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is rhythmic network activity in the gamma-frequency band (30-80 Hz, gamma oscillations) (15)(16)(17). Gamma oscillations are a result of the synchronized electrical activity of the neurons within a network and are thought to be important for temporal encoding, binding of sensory features, and memory storage and retrieval (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%