2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal reasoning applied to sensory analysis: The case of the Italian wine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no association in relation to GQS and the Kruskal-Wallis test, which does not corroborate a significant difference in means in this analysis. On this matter our results differ from those of Golia et al (2017), who found a positive influence on overall wine rating as alcoholic strength increased. This indicates that the trend that dominated the 1990s and 2000s for very alcoholic wines, in the wake of Parker's wine guide (Hommerberg, 2011), does not hold sway among today's wine experts.…”
Section: Table IVcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no association in relation to GQS and the Kruskal-Wallis test, which does not corroborate a significant difference in means in this analysis. On this matter our results differ from those of Golia et al (2017), who found a positive influence on overall wine rating as alcoholic strength increased. This indicates that the trend that dominated the 1990s and 2000s for very alcoholic wines, in the wake of Parker's wine guide (Hommerberg, 2011), does not hold sway among today's wine experts.…”
Section: Table IVcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The protocols were conducted in accordance with the implementation of the sensory evaluation guidelines. [24] The sample red wine was stored at 4°C until tasting. Wine was placed in a clear glass cup under the regular fluorescent lights.…”
Section: Total Phenolic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair comparison method was used based on the protocols of the sensory evaluation guidelines. [29] For each test, the commercial wine was used as the standard and the testing samples included the commercial wine, the control sample, SO 2 sample, and αpinene samples with different concentrations. The tasting results were discarded, when the results of panelist(s) had significant difference between the standard and the commercial sample in the testing groups.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%