2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cause related marketing in the German retail sector: Exploring the role of consumers’ trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more that consumers trust firms and certification institutions, the more confidence they have in quality signals (Sodano, ). Several studies have shown that institution‐based trust can be transferred to private‐labeled products (e.g., Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, ; Hartmann, Klink, & Simons, ). Therefore, we expect consumers who report a higher level of trust in the food system to be more likely to rely on quality signals to make choices.…”
Section: Conceptual and Econometric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more that consumers trust firms and certification institutions, the more confidence they have in quality signals (Sodano, ). Several studies have shown that institution‐based trust can be transferred to private‐labeled products (e.g., Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, ; Hartmann, Klink, & Simons, ). Therefore, we expect consumers who report a higher level of trust in the food system to be more likely to rely on quality signals to make choices.…”
Section: Conceptual and Econometric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) CRM and its related outcomes (Ballings et al, 2018;Chang et al, 2018;Christofi et al, 2013;2015b;La Ferle et al, 2013;Grolleau et al, 2016;Heidarzadeh Hanzaee et al, 2019;Hartmann et al, 2015;He et al, 2019;Howie et al, 2018;Mora and Vila, 2018;Srivastava, 2018;Parris and Peachey, 2013;Varadarajan and Menon, 1998;Yang and Yen, 2018); and (c) factors influencing consumers' evaluations and attitudes toward CRM (Howie et al, 2018;Bergkvist and Zhou, 2019;Chang et al, 2018;Cui et al, 2003;Hamby and Brinberg, 2018;Mora and Vila, 2018;Ladero et al, 2015).…”
Section: 'S Use Of Real-life Examples Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies (Agnihotri and Bhattacharya, 2019;Marques et al, 2019), when a company has internalization among its intentions, then it increases Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities for its communication, implying that CRM might increase too, since it is under 'the umbrella' of CSR. Hartmann et al (2015), highlight that CRM has grown to be one of the most powerful marketing means which allows companies to communicate their overall corporate culture concerning CSR at the points of sale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 presents a summary of the stakeholder consequences from Checkout Charity found in the academic literature. ·Increased sales and profits (Coleman & Peasley, 2015) ·Increased loyalty and morale (Hartmann, Klink, & Simons, 2015) ·Increased public relations and enhanced reputation (Hessekiel, 2017) ·Charities:…”
Section: Stakeholder Consequences Of Checkout Charitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…·Loss of money (Siebold, 2014) ·Increased social pressure to conform or comply (Krishna, 2011) ·Less choice of when, where, and how to heip others (Eikenberry, 2009) ·Less awareness of where donations go (Owens, 2016) ·Increased distraction/confusion (Eikenberry, 2009) Given the many benefits retailers receive from Checkout Charity, it is little wonder so many choose this form of CRM. Retailers can expect to increase their sales revenue, employee morale, and customer loyalty (Hartmann, Klink, & Simons, 2015). Moreover, as customers, employees, and society all want to see companies performing more social action (Coleman & Peasley, 2015), retailers can also expect to enhance their reputations and receive a public relations boon (Hessekiel, 2017).…”
Section: ·Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%