1982
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2134(82)90005-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and consequences of harsh parental punishment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Engfer and Schneewind (1982) suggest that the emotional instability of parents contributes to harsh parental punishment. This finding might explain why children quickly learn to recognize emotional instability, and why they use all available cues, including olfactory information, to assess neuroticism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Engfer and Schneewind (1982) suggest that the emotional instability of parents contributes to harsh parental punishment. This finding might explain why children quickly learn to recognize emotional instability, and why they use all available cues, including olfactory information, to assess neuroticism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between nonoptimal child-rearing practices and children's negative personality characteristics (Path D) also has been documented in prospective studies (Engfer & Schneewind, 1982;Patterson & Dishion, 1988). The results of retrospective research with male and female adults are similar to the ndings with children, demonstrating that less positive parenting in the family of origin is related to depression or negative personality characteristics of children (Belsky et al, 1986;Belsky & Pensky, 1988;Caspi & Elder, 1988;McCrae & Costa, 1988;Meyer, 1988;Simons et al, 1991;Whitbeck et al, 1993).…”
Section: Parenting and Children's Personalitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…But her other categories, such as "frequency" (Category 1), did not exclude overly severe forms of CP when the specific question asked of the respondent was about their frequency (E. T. Gershoff, personal communication, October 12, 2001). This meant that slapping in the face or beating with a stick (Engfer & Schneewind, 1982;Eron, 1982;Lefkowitz, Walder, & Eron, 1963;Mahoney, Donnelly, Lewis, & Maynard, 2000) or hitting, pushing, grabbing, or shoving (Simons, Johnson, & Conger, 1994) were not coded as severe when the studies asked about their frequency. Straus (1994) claimed that the physical abuse or Severe Violence items in the Conflict Tactics Scale can be used "to partial out physical abuse in a statistical analysis or to remove abused children from the sample in order to avoid confounding corporal punishment with physical abuse" (p. 202).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%