2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0043933915002135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens

Abstract: Keel bone damage (KBD) is a critical issue facing the contemporary laying hen industry due to the likely pain leading to compromised welfare and reduced productivity. Recent reports suggest that KBD, while highly variable and likely dependent on a host of factors, extends to all housing systems (including traditional battery cages, furnished cages and non-cage systems), genetic lines, and management styles. Despite the extent of the problem, the research community remains uncertain as to the causes and influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Housing of laying hens for egg production is known to be associated with skeletal problems such as fractures and deformities of the keel bone (1). The causes of such fractures have not been definitively identified but are suspected to be a multifactorial problem including: genetic regulation of bone health and high egg laying performance (2,3), bone calcium depletion, and collisions within the housing systems (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Housing of laying hens for egg production is known to be associated with skeletal problems such as fractures and deformities of the keel bone (1). The causes of such fractures have not been definitively identified but are suspected to be a multifactorial problem including: genetic regulation of bone health and high egg laying performance (2,3), bone calcium depletion, and collisions within the housing systems (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional opportunity for exercise in enriched cages and alternative systems improves bone health (Fleming et al 1994), but also results in increases opportunities for collisions with the environment, which can lead to KBF. Overall, higher rates of KBF occur in alternative systems (28-89%) than in cages (22-44%) (Sherwin et al 2010;Wilkins et al 2011), with rates increased further in systems with elevated perches or tiers (Sandilands et al 2009;Harlander-Matauschek et al 2015;Stratmann et al 2015). The unacceptably high level of KBF in all systems (Heerkens et al 2016;Wilkins et al 2011) and evidence that these fractures are painful and alter behaviour (Nasr et al 2013) suggests KBF is a significant welfare concern.…”
Section: Bone Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although opportunities for exercise in enriched and non-cage housing do result in stronger bones, the skeleton of the modern laying is still relatively weak and increased freedom of movement also increases risks for bone fractures from collisions with furnishings. The keel bone (sternum) is particularly susceptible to fractures and prevalence rates have been reported to range from 10 to 30% in conventional cages, 20 to 60% in enriched cages and greater than 85% in non-cage systems [102]. Genetic selection for improved bone strength may provide a solution, although there appears to be an inverse relationship between production traits (egg number and shell quality) and bone strength.…”
Section: Trade-offs Among Welfare Economics Environmental Impact Anmentioning
confidence: 99%