1987
DOI: 10.1086/261456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
134
2
Order By: Relevance
“…32 A positive effect of concentration is found by Esty and Caves (1983), Gardner (1987), Guttman (1980), Zupan (1984), andTrefler (1993). Negative, ambiguous or insignificant effects are reported in Becker (1986), Cahan and Kaempfer (1992), Pincus (1975), Quinn and Shapiro (1991), and Salamon and Siegfried (1977).…”
Section: Stakes and Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…32 A positive effect of concentration is found by Esty and Caves (1983), Gardner (1987), Guttman (1980), Zupan (1984), andTrefler (1993). Negative, ambiguous or insignificant effects are reported in Becker (1986), Cahan and Kaempfer (1992), Pincus (1975), Quinn and Shapiro (1991), and Salamon and Siegfried (1977).…”
Section: Stakes and Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…29 See, e.g., Gardner (1987), Guttman (1978), Hunter and Nelson (1989), Kamath (1989), Miller (1991, Pincus (1975), Salamon and Siegfried (1977). penetration are expected to increase an industry's demand for government intervention (Jarrell, 1978;Trefler, 1993). If competitive pressures are high and prices are low, an industry is more likely to vie for protective regulation.…”
Section: Stakes and Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to these arguments, the richer the country and the fewer the farmers, the lower the organizational costs and free-riding activities. Gardner (1987) finds empirical support for these factors in explaining US farm policy, and Bates (1987) for African agricultural policies. Another puzzling observation that limits the utility of collective action theory is the different regulatory preferences between the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany.…”
Section: Food Safety and The Sps Agreementmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The endogenous theory of economic policy that recognizes policymakers as rational agents maximizing their political preference function subject to political and economic constraints has been widely applied in the study of government intervention in the farm commodity markets (Gardner, 1983(Gardner, , 1987Oehmke and Yao, 1990;Rausser and Foster, 1990;Bullock, 1994). Based on the interactions between the government and various interest groups whose welfare will be affected by the policy concerned, the political preference function is a useful tool to analyze government policies regarding the pricing and trade of grain in the OECD countries including the US, Japan, and Korea (Oehmke and Yao, 1990;Lee and Kennedy, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%