2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-75865-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes, Prevention, and Mitigation Workgroup Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, limiting nutrient inputs often does not control FHABs in the near term. The implementation of nutrient input-reduction strategies is usually a long-term undertaking, and nutrient loads already in sediment frequently stimulate FHABs when resuspended into the water column (Paerl, 2008;Perovich et al, 2008;Pieler, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, limiting nutrient inputs often does not control FHABs in the near term. The implementation of nutrient input-reduction strategies is usually a long-term undertaking, and nutrient loads already in sediment frequently stimulate FHABs when resuspended into the water column (Paerl, 2008;Perovich et al, 2008;Pieler, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Estimating the nutrient load reductions necessary to achieve target bloom sizes requires models capable of quantifying the relationshipbetween load and bloom severity. Accurate quantification of the uncertainty associated with the load-bloom relationship is also critical to provide policy makers with defensible ranges of likely future bloom sizes corresponding to different P load scenarios.Quantified uncertainty should be recognized as essential information in the decision process (Reckhow, 1994;Reckhow and Chapra, 1999)and is particularly important when modeling a phenomenon like cyanobacteria blooms, where substantial limitations and uncertainties are known to affect the methods used to measure bloom size (Ho and Michalak, 2015;Reinart and Kutser, 2006;Srivastava et al, 2013), as well as our knowledge of the multiple interacting processes that influence bloom formation (Perovich et al, 2008). Failure to account for these sources of variance could lead to models that do not accurately reflect our actual knowledge of the system`s behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrophytes are able to improve water quality by adsorbing nutrients through their roots, adsorbing microbes and floating matter through their leaves and stems and precipitating suspended particulates [86]. Macrophytes and their roots can be used to stabilize sediment so that it is less likely to be suspended by wind-induced waves and release additional nutrients that can be utilized by phytoplankton [81,86]. Planting of macrophytes is one technique that can be used to help maintain the sediment and keep nutrients from becoming resuspended in the water column.…”
Section: Biological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%