2011
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2011-20026-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity cooling of atoms: within and without a cavity

Abstract: We compare the efficiencies of two optical cooling schemes, where a single particle is either inside or outside an optical cavity, under experimentally-realisable conditions. We evaluate the cooling forces using the general solution of a transfer matrix method for a moving scatterer inside a general one-dimensional system composed of immobile optical elements. Assuming the same atomic saturation parameter, we find that the two cooling schemes provide cooling forces and equilibrium temperatures of comparable ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard approach for atoms, laser cooling, is in general impossible for molecules due to the lack of suitable cycling transitions. Creating an artificial cycling transition via cavity cooling [18] has not been demonstrated despite substantial experimental [19] and theoretical [20][21][22] effort. Likewise, evaporative or sympathetic cooling to ultracold temperatures [23] has not been realized due to lack of density or losses from inelastic collisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard approach for atoms, laser cooling, is in general impossible for molecules due to the lack of suitable cycling transitions. Creating an artificial cycling transition via cavity cooling [18] has not been demonstrated despite substantial experimental [19] and theoretical [20][21][22] effort. Likewise, evaporative or sympathetic cooling to ultracold temperatures [23] has not been realized due to lack of density or losses from inelastic collisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this, the force, momentum diffusion and equilibrium temperature do not in any way depend on the position of the particle along the cavity field in a 1D model. The issue of sub-wavelength modulation of the friction force is a major limitation of cooling methods based on intracavity standing fields, in particular mirror-mediated cooling [28] and cavity-mediated cooling [13].…”
Section: General Expressions and Equilibrium Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this work has been focused on standing-wave (Fabry-Pérot) cavities, where high Q-factors can be achieved experimentally to significantly enhance optomechanical forces. However, in the limit of strong scatterers, friction forces in standingwave cavities become increasingly position-dependent [13], which limits the overall, averaged cooling efficiency. This can be overcome by using ring cavities [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] where the translational symmetry guarantees position-independent forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%