2009
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200839152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD4+ T‐cell‐mediated anti‐tumor immunity can be uncoupled from autoimmunity via the STAT4/STAT6 signaling axis

Abstract: Previous reports have suggested that autoimmune sequelae may be an unavoidable consequence of successful immunization against tumor-associated antigens, which are typically non-mutated self-antigens. Using a melanoma model, we demonstrated that CD4 1 T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity and autoimmunity could be separated by modulating the STAT4/STAT6 signaling axis. Our results have revealed an unexpected dichotomy in the effector phase following cancer vaccination where anti-tumor immunity is mediated via a S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New experimental results have suggested a more direct role for the CD4 + T cells (Mattes et al 2003;Perez-Diez et al 2007;Zhang et al 2009). In particular, these cells appear to have an effector role through the cytokines and chemokines that they produce (Mattes et al 2003;Zhang et al 2009). This means that CD4 + T cells can kill cancer cells even in the absence of CD8 + T cells and NK cells.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…New experimental results have suggested a more direct role for the CD4 + T cells (Mattes et al 2003;Perez-Diez et al 2007;Zhang et al 2009). In particular, these cells appear to have an effector role through the cytokines and chemokines that they produce (Mattes et al 2003;Zhang et al 2009). This means that CD4 + T cells can kill cancer cells even in the absence of CD8 + T cells and NK cells.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, IL-4 may antagonize tumor progression through local recruitment of neutrophils and eosinophils (25,26), dysregulation of stromal fibroblasts (27), and inhibition of angiogenesis (28). Reflecting this complexity, type 2 polarized tumor-infiltrating T-cells may either promote tumor rejection (22,29) or progression (20 -22), depending upon model system. Despite the intricate relationship between endogenous IL-4 and cancer, administration of supraphysiologic amounts of this cytokine has been widely tested as an experimental therapy for several malignancies.…”
Section: Il-4 a Cytokine With Several Pathophysiologic And Therapeutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
a b s t r a c tRecent experiments indicate that CD4 + Th2 cells can reject skin tumors in mice, while CD4 + Th1 cells cannot (Mattes et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2009). These results are surprising because CD4 + Th1 cells are typically considered to be capable of tumor rejection.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this article, we investigate the surprising observation that Th2 cells, but not Th1 cells, are responsible for rejecting skin tumors produced by the widely used B16F10 melanoma cell line that grows in immune-competent mice (Mattes et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2009). As a tool to make sense of these observed tumor-immune interactions, we used mathematical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%