2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1866266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDS Auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such auctions must take place within 30 days of a credit event and allow for the delivery of any bonds of a defaulted company from a prespecified list, leading to the cheapest‐to‐deliver option. The value of this option should be small for corporate entities because their bonds tend to trade at approximately the same price after a credit event (Chernov, Gorbenko, and Makarov (2013)).…”
Section: A Primer On Us Sovereign Cdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such auctions must take place within 30 days of a credit event and allow for the delivery of any bonds of a defaulted company from a prespecified list, leading to the cheapest‐to‐deliver option. The value of this option should be small for corporate entities because their bonds tend to trade at approximately the same price after a credit event (Chernov, Gorbenko, and Makarov (2013)).…”
Section: A Primer On Us Sovereign Cdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fostel and Geanakoplos (2012) show how the CDS market may have contributed to the crash of 2007-2009. Oehmke and Zawadowski (2015) explore the e↵ect of CDS markets on liquidity in the corporate bond market, and Chernov et al (2013) show that CDS auctions can be biased. Among these theoretical contributions, our paper is most closely related to Bolton and Oehmke (2011), as the channels through which CDSs a↵ect firm value are very similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, two other theoretical models of CDS auctions have been proposed in the literature. The model of Chernov, Gorbenko, and Makarov (, CGM) is an extension of the strategic bidding models of Wilson () and Back and Zender (). CGM (2013) deliver the important insight that CDS auction participants have incentives to manipulate the second‐stage price to profit from their existing CDS positions.…”
Section: Price Bias and Inefficient Allocations In Cds Auctions (Withmentioning
confidence: 99%