2010
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201000058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CE‐MS in biomarker discovery, validation, and clinical application

Abstract: CE coupled MS (CE-MS) has become an increasingly employed technology in proteome analysis with focus on the identification of biomarker peptides in clinical proteomics. In this review, we will cover technical aspects of CE-MS coupling and highlight the improvements made in the last few years. We examine CE-MS from an application point of view, and evaluate its merits and vices for biomarker discovery and clinical applications. We discuss the principal theoretical and practical obstacles encountered when employ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This automated, sensitive, fast proteome analysis technique [21] using CE as a front-end fractionation coupled to mass spectrometry, separates peptides and small proteins (<20 kDa) based on migration in the electrical field with high resolution in a single step. It enables analysis of thousands of peptides per sample using a sub-microliter sample volume and it has been used in numerous clinical biomarker studies, mostly examining urine as the specimen of interest [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This automated, sensitive, fast proteome analysis technique [21] using CE as a front-end fractionation coupled to mass spectrometry, separates peptides and small proteins (<20 kDa) based on migration in the electrical field with high resolution in a single step. It enables analysis of thousands of peptides per sample using a sub-microliter sample volume and it has been used in numerous clinical biomarker studies, mostly examining urine as the specimen of interest [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has already enabled the identification of urinary biomarker classifiers for the diagnosis of diseases like chronic kidney disease [11], acute kidney injury [12], stroke [13], and cardiovascular diseases [14]. It allows classification of case versus control groups with good accuracy [15]. The use of urine rather than blood for the identification of biomarkers has several advantages, including non-invasive sample collection, a high stability due to absence of proteolytic agents and a low dynamic range of analyte concentration which facilitates the detection and quantification of peptides [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Hence, CE-MS has been used to analyze urine samples from patients with various renal and nonrenal diseases. 14 CE-MS was used for the identification of a panel of 273 urinary peptide biomarkers of CKD (CKD273 classifier) by comparison of the urinary proteome of 379 healthy participants and 230 participants with CKD originating from a variety of renal diseases 15,16 followed by the validation of these findings in independent cohorts. 17,18 Small-scale studies in patients with diabetes showed that this classifier is able to predict the progression from normoalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%