1997
DOI: 10.1093/jac/39.1.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cefodizime: effects of sub-inhibitory concentrations on adhesiveness and bacterial morphology of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli: comparison with cefotaxime and ceftriaxone

Abstract: Exposure of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli strains to different subMICs of cefodizime, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone significantly reduced the bacterial attachment to human buccal cells, but the resultant patterns of inhibition were different for S. aureus and E. coli and for the behaviour of the three cephalosporins. Morphological anomalies such as clusters of enlarged S. aureus cells and filamentation with spheroplast-like structures and bulge formations in E. coli were also present. Analogies betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During growth in the absence of IPTG, all mutant cells eventually formed bulges before death. Similar membrane bulging is seen in bacteria treated with cell wall-targeting antibiotics (8,10) and is frequently observed in the E. coli mutant BC202 (35), suggesting that DedA family proteins play a pivotal role in envelope maintenance.…”
Section: Vol 192 2010supporting
confidence: 56%
“…During growth in the absence of IPTG, all mutant cells eventually formed bulges before death. Similar membrane bulging is seen in bacteria treated with cell wall-targeting antibiotics (8,10) and is frequently observed in the E. coli mutant BC202 (35), suggesting that DedA family proteins play a pivotal role in envelope maintenance.…”
Section: Vol 192 2010supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Other variables known to influence results relate to the test organism and incubation conditions. Bacterial factors affecting morphostructural changes include the cell wall structure of the test organism (Gram-positive vs Gram-negative) [50], the species that is used [51,52], the characteristics of the test strain (including its antibiotic susceptibility) [53,54], and the inoculum density [55,56]. Growthphase affects the size, shape, and cell wall thickness of bacteria even in the absence of antibacterial agent, stationary phase cells being smaller [57,58], having a lower axial ratio [57], and a thicker cell wall [59,60] than logarithmically growing cells.…”
Section: Variables Affecting Antibacterial Agent-induced Morphologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increases in the diameter of cocci can be difficult to interpret if detected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) only [50,61]. If, however, the enlarged bacteria are examined in cross-section, the increase in size can usually be attributed to inhibition of cell separation ('pseudomulticellular bacteria') [127,158], or osmotic swelling ('spheroplasts' or 'protoplasts') [84].…”
Section: Altered Cell Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expression of virulence functions such as toxins, adhesins, and biofilm formation in the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus is affected by exposure to sub-MICs of antibiotics (2,6,7,11,12,14,19). Sub-MICs of certain antibiotics, in particular, compounds whose primary mode of action is DNA damage, are known to enhance mutation rates in bacteria (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%