2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Form and Function: Interpreting and Controlling the Shape of Adherent Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, many functions in the cell are dictated by changes in cellular morphology . Herein we also found that the cytotoxicity function and CTL‐to‐target cell interaction, as representative of initial steps in IS formation, were compromised in Arp3‐KD CTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, many functions in the cell are dictated by changes in cellular morphology . Herein we also found that the cytotoxicity function and CTL‐to‐target cell interaction, as representative of initial steps in IS formation, were compromised in Arp3‐KD CTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…On the one hand, the most of gene expression studies used osteogenic- and chondrogenic-related markers such as cartilage formation genes (12 papers): ACAN (aggrecan), COL1, COL2, COL10 (collagen type I, II, X), or SOX-9. On the other hand, 37 papers conclude that there no morphological differences after bioprinting in comparison to a 2D culture and 19 papers clarify that the increasing of the stiffness, due to the increasing of the viscosity and concentration of the material or modifications of crosslinking parameters, tend cells to adopt a round shape losing its functionality (Prasad and Alizadeh, 2019 ). In this sense, two kinds of tests are commonly performed to determine the live/dead proportion of cells (viability tests) and its metabolic activity (metabolic tests).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanostructures as well can influence cell attachment, whereby structures smaller than 70 nm or with a mean distance of more than 70 nm (which is the case in the presented structures) have a negative effect on the integrin grouping and thus, on the formation of focal adhesions [65]. A large cell area and fibroblastic morphology with numerous extensions on rigid surfaces is particularly characteristic of good cell adhesion [66,67] and goes hand in hand with well-developed focal adhesions, most of which are longer and more strongly coupled to the actin cytoskeleton in order to ensure optimal force transmission [28,49,50]. The combination of a nanotopography, which leads to the formation of small focal adhesions, and a microtopography, which causes a disturbance of the actin cytoskeleton, can thus explain the observed, particularly negative effects on adhesion and the processes dependent on it, such as proliferation and migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%