2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell line-dependent differences in uptake and retention of the hypoxia-selective nuclear imaging agent Cu-ATSM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Groups using each of these hypoxia radiotracers have discussed their potential for RT dose painting as proposed by Ling et al (40). Our clinical study focused on the use of 18 F-FMISO because our in vitro (67) and in vivo (17) analyses of 64 Cu-ATSM and 18 F-FMISO demonstrated unresolved tumor cell line uptake kinetic dependence for the 64 Cu-ATSM tracer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Groups using each of these hypoxia radiotracers have discussed their potential for RT dose painting as proposed by Ling et al (40). Our clinical study focused on the use of 18 F-FMISO because our in vitro (67) and in vivo (17) analyses of 64 Cu-ATSM and 18 F-FMISO demonstrated unresolved tumor cell line uptake kinetic dependence for the 64 Cu-ATSM tracer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The retention mechanism is not entirely understood but the fast tissue distribution of Cu-ATSM is advantageous. However, several studies have shown that the hypoxia-specificity of Cu-ATSM is tumor cell line dependent in vitro [20,21] as well as in vivo [22Á24] which severely limits its possible role as a universal PET hypoxia imaging agent. As pointed out earlier the tracer ratio between hypoxic and non-hypoxic tumor entities is expected to increase over time as it allows for binding of more tracer and, equally important, clearance of unbound image-contaminating tracer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not yet known whether this is also true in cardiac tissue, or whether the fate of radiocopper is ischemia-or hypoxia-dependent, or varies between different BTSC complexes. Burgman et al have suggested a further selectivity mechanism, that of transporter-mediated efflux of radiocopper from the cell, where the cell-dependent differences that they observe in radiocopper retention may be governed by differences in expression of the copper exporters ATP7A and ATP7B [107]. This has not yet been investigated further.…”
Section: What Is Fate Of the Radiocopper?mentioning
confidence: 99%