2013
DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2013.10784721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Phones in the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M incorporated social media in the learning process to encourage student-centred learning, autonomy, self-regulation, collaboration and fruitful interactions, and all these aspects are known to promote engagement (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2012;Johnston, 2016;Rutherford, 2010;Tarantino et al, 2013). Unlike educators who perceive that cell phones would cause distractions, and could have a negative impact on learning (Duncan et al, 2012;Johnston, 2016;Thomas & O'Bannon, 2013), M's attitude to cell phone technology in the classroom was supportive and students were able to bring their smartphones to class and use them for specific activities. Teachers tend to ban cell phones or other mobile devices, such as laptops, from the classroom when they lack confidence in using the technologies, are unsure how to design learning tasks using them, and have no motivation to incorporate them in learning and teaching (Tarantino et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Influence and Role Of The Teachermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…M incorporated social media in the learning process to encourage student-centred learning, autonomy, self-regulation, collaboration and fruitful interactions, and all these aspects are known to promote engagement (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2012;Johnston, 2016;Rutherford, 2010;Tarantino et al, 2013). Unlike educators who perceive that cell phones would cause distractions, and could have a negative impact on learning (Duncan et al, 2012;Johnston, 2016;Thomas & O'Bannon, 2013), M's attitude to cell phone technology in the classroom was supportive and students were able to bring their smartphones to class and use them for specific activities. Teachers tend to ban cell phones or other mobile devices, such as laptops, from the classroom when they lack confidence in using the technologies, are unsure how to design learning tasks using them, and have no motivation to incorporate them in learning and teaching (Tarantino et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Influence and Role Of The Teachermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The study conducted by [38] shows that although both students and teachers at Batna-2 University use mobile devices so as to facilitate and support the learning process, nearly 35 % of the students confess that mobile devices are helpful tools in terms of cheating at examinations. The leading concerns expressed by a study which aimed at examining the perceptions of 92 preservice teachers (enrolled in a Midwestern liberal arts university) involved classroom disruptions and cheating [39]. Bower and Sturman (2015) [40] examined the perceptions of 66 educators from around the world who thought about themselves as having good or very good understanding of wearable technologies.…”
Section: Mobile Technologies and Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas and O'Bannon explored behavioral, normative, and control beliefs of preservice teachers in liberal arts specialty about their intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in their future classrooms. The survey results show that they advise teacher educators should aim at these beliefs in teacher development programs so as to make pre-service teachers successfully apply Web 2.0 technologies in their future K-12 classrooms [6]. In 2015, Liu and Jiang published College English Teaching Design and Practice Based on WChat Platform in which they systematically analyzed the application of WeChat platform in college English teaching, designed college English WeChat platform and gained good practical effect [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%