2023
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giad015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell type–specific interpretation of noncoding variants using deep learning–based methods

Abstract: Interpretation of noncoding genomic variants is one of the most important challenges in human genetics. Machine learning methods have emerged recently as a powerful tool to solve this problem. State-of-the-art approaches allow prediction of transcriptional and epigenetic effects caused by noncoding mutations. However, these approaches require specific experimental data for training and cannot generalize across cell types where required features were not experimentally measured. We show here that available epig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, G). These observations reinforce our prior observation [5] that broad histone marks necessitate an expansive context for precise prediction. This highlights the pivotal role of models capable of handling extended input lengths for such tasks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2, G). These observations reinforce our prior observation [5] that broad histone marks necessitate an expansive context for precise prediction. This highlights the pivotal role of models capable of handling extended input lengths for such tasks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found that the optimal balance between these two factors varies depending on the specific task. For instance, an extended context is vital for predicting promoter activity or deciphering widespread histone mark distributions, as previously indicated by [5]. However, for certain tasks, a more concise context is adequate, making it more advantageous to augment the model’s parameter count.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation