1984
DOI: 10.1128/jb.160.1.299-303.1984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell wall receptor for bacteriophage Mu G(+)

Abstract: The invertible G segment in phage Mu DNA controls the host range of the phage. Depending on the orientation of the G segment, two types of phage particles, G(+) and G(-), are produced which recognize different cell surface receptors. The receptor for Mu G(+) was located in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of gram-negative bacteria. The analysis of different LPS core types and of mutants that were made resistant to Mu G(+) shows that the primary receptor site on Escherichia coli K-12 lies in the GlcNAc beta 1 . . .… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite nearly a century of pioneering molecular work, the mechanistic insights into phage specificity for a given host, infection pathways, and the breadth of bacterial responses to different phages have largely focused on a handful of individual bacterium-phage systems [9][10][11][12][13]. Bacterial sensitivity/resistance to phages is typically characterized using phenotypic methods such as cross-infection patterns against a panel of phages [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] or by whole-genome sequencing of phage-resistant mutants [28][29][30][31][32]. As such, our understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms against phages remains limited, and the field is therefore in need of improved methods to characterize phage-host interactions, determine the generality and diversity of phage resistance mechanisms in nature, and identify the degree of specificity for each bacterial resistance mechanism across diverse phage types [13,25,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite nearly a century of pioneering molecular work, the mechanistic insights into phage specificity for a given host, infection pathways, and the breadth of bacterial responses to different phages have largely focused on a handful of individual bacterium-phage systems [9][10][11][12][13]. Bacterial sensitivity/resistance to phages is typically characterized using phenotypic methods such as cross-infection patterns against a panel of phages [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] or by whole-genome sequencing of phage-resistant mutants [28][29][30][31][32]. As such, our understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms against phages remains limited, and the field is therefore in need of improved methods to characterize phage-host interactions, determine the generality and diversity of phage resistance mechanisms in nature, and identify the degree of specificity for each bacterial resistance mechanism across diverse phage types [13,25,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivation of the phage by LPS was described previously [8]. LPS was extracted from E. coli C and Erwinia according to the procedure of Galanos [16] and from the other strains by the method of Westphal [17] and purified by ultracentrifugation at 100000 × g. The overall yield of LPS was approx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown previously that Mu binds to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as the cellsurface receptor and furthermore that Mu G(+) and G(-) differ in the recognition of LPS structures [7]. Adsorption of Mu G(+) requires the terminal Glcal,2Glc disaccharide in the cell wall of E. coli K-12 [8]. Interestingly Mu G(+) has somewhat different receptor requirements from phages Pl, P7 and D108 in spite of the fact that these have largely homologous invertible DNA segments and host-range control systems [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains carrying a deletion of waaCF (deep rough strains) are resistant to infection with phage P1 (Sandulache et al, 1984). Therefore, in order to transduce the waaCF deletion mutation into the ΔeptB and ΔeptBΔmgrR mutant strain backgrounds, a P1 lysate was prepared on a strain in which the chromosomal ΔwaaCF::tet was complemented by a plasmid.…”
Section: Bacterial Strains and Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%