2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.17.947416
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CellOracle: Dissecting cell identity via network inference and in silico gene perturbation

Abstract: Here, we present CellOracle, a computational tool that integrates single-cell transcriptome and epigenome profiles to infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs), critical regulators of cell identity. Leveraging inferred GRNs, we simulate gene expression changes in response to transcription factor (TF) perturbation, enabling network configurations to be interrogated in silico, facilitating their interpretation. We validate the efficacy of CellOracle to recapitulate known regulatory changes across hematopoiesis, corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While powerful in interpreting interactions, mechanistic models usually require temporally-resolved data often unavailable in practice, and most do not scale to genome-wide measurements and challenges such as predicting high-dimensional scRNA-seq data. Linear models[12, 21] do not suffer from these scalability issues but have limited predictive power and are unable to capture non-linear cell-type specific responses. In contrast, deep learning (DL) models do not face these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While powerful in interpreting interactions, mechanistic models usually require temporally-resolved data often unavailable in practice, and most do not scale to genome-wide measurements and challenges such as predicting high-dimensional scRNA-seq data. Linear models[12, 21] do not suffer from these scalability issues but have limited predictive power and are unable to capture non-linear cell-type specific responses. In contrast, deep learning (DL) models do not face these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of gene expression responses to perturbation using scRNA-seq data is an active research area. To the best of our knowledge, there are two software tools that have been developed for this purpose: scGen [3] and CellOracle [4]. scGen is a package implemented in Python, using TensorFlow variational autoencoders combined with vector arithmetic to predict gene expression changes in cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, essential genes cannot be knocked out. For that reason, predictive computational methods stand as a possible solution for such prohibitive experiments [2][3][4]. Taking advantage of the synchronized gene expression variability allowing the detection of co-expression between genes belonging to the same biological processes or being under the effect of the same transcription factors, it is now possible to construct personalized transcriptome-wide GRNs that are sample, tissue, and cell type-specific [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, scRNA-seq captures the gene expression of thousands of individual cells in one experiment, which provides a large number of independent measurements that allow the extraction of information about gene expression heterogeneity across cells and gene-gene coexpression in individual cells. Hence, scRNA-seq allows the inference of cell type-or cell subtype-specific GRNs [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], which constitutes an important step in the implementation of network-based methods for cellular conversion [12,13] (Table 1). In particular, using a machine learning approach, it has been possible to identify different GRN configurations corresponding to different states of pluripotency, including naive and primed states [4].…”
Section: Box 1 Applications Of Different Modeling Types To Stem Cell Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%