1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60720-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular and Subcellular Localization of the Dopamine Transporter in Rat Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
72
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these results indicate that D1-like receptor stimulation is necessary, but not sufficient, for the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, similar to instrumental responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement (Winstanley et al, 2006). Conditioned stimuli elicit prolonged increases in dopamine neurotransmission (Garris et al, 1993;Sesack et al, 1998), which may permit the OFC to maintain the internal motivational representation of cocaine-paired contextual stimuli by facilitating glutamatergic inputs to the OFC (Cepeda et al, 1998a;Lapish et al, 2006;Schultz, 2002;Seamans et al, 2003). Furthermore, this phenomenon likely involves glutamatergic afferents from the BLA (Fuchs et al, 2005(Fuchs et al, , 2004Lasseter et al, 2009Lasseter et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Together, these results indicate that D1-like receptor stimulation is necessary, but not sufficient, for the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, similar to instrumental responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement (Winstanley et al, 2006). Conditioned stimuli elicit prolonged increases in dopamine neurotransmission (Garris et al, 1993;Sesack et al, 1998), which may permit the OFC to maintain the internal motivational representation of cocaine-paired contextual stimuli by facilitating glutamatergic inputs to the OFC (Cepeda et al, 1998a;Lapish et al, 2006;Schultz, 2002;Seamans et al, 2003). Furthermore, this phenomenon likely involves glutamatergic afferents from the BLA (Fuchs et al, 2005(Fuchs et al, , 2004Lasseter et al, 2009Lasseter et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This effect was interpreted as being secondary to effects of DAT on striatal function, given that the expression of DAT in the prefrontal cortex is relatively low (12,(33)(34)(35). However, DAT is generally present in higher concentrations in the parietal than the prefrontal cortex (4,6,67). This observation raises the possibility that variation in DAT may have relatively greater influence on the availability of dopamine in the synaptic cleft of dopaminergic terminals in the parietal cortex compared with cortical regions where removal of synaptic dopamine is primarily a function of COMT (5, 6, 9, 68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DAT is a presynaptic neuronal membrane protein, which removes dopamine from the synaptic cleft (1) and is thought to be particularly important as a regulator of phasic dopamine release in subcortical regions where DAT is most abundant (2)(3)(4). In cortical regions, where DAT is less abundant, postsynapatic intracellular degradation by the COMT enzyme is an important regulator of dopamine function (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). In the cortex, DAT is mainly extrasynaptic, and thus, seems better situated to regulating dopamine diffusion to the extrasynaptic space (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DA has higher affinity for NET than for DAT (Eshleman et al, 1999) and PFc DAT densities are relatively low (Sesack et al, 1998) in comparison with PFc NET densities (Schroeter et al, 2000), PFc DA uptake may depend more significantly on NET (Carboni et al, 1990;Moron et al, 2002). In caudate putamen (CPu) and NAc, where DAT densities predominate, DA uptake is likely to depend primarily on DAT (Moron et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%