2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5cc03472h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular uptake: lessons from supramolecular organic chemistry

Abstract: The objective of this Feature Article is to reflect on the importance of established and emerging principles of supramolecular organic chemistry to address one of the most persistent problems in life sciences. The main topic is dynamic covalent chemistry on cell surfaces, particularly disulfide exchange for thiol-mediated uptake. Examples of boronate and hydrazone exchange are added for contrast, comparison and completion. Of equal importance are the discussions of proximity effects in polyions and counterion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
222
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
3
222
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17][18] Thep ositively charged guanidinium groups in CPDs help cargo accumulation near the negatively charged mammalian cell surface and their disulfide backbone helps intracellular cargo delivery via disulfide-exchange mechanisms with no apparent endosomal trapping. [19] In the cytoplasm, CPDs undergo rapid depolymerization (< 5min), ap rocess catalyzed by endogenous glutathione (GSH). At present, both non-covalent and covalent conjugations are available to append CPDs to proteins modified either genetically or chemically with suitable "tags" (i.e.h istidine tag).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18] Thep ositively charged guanidinium groups in CPDs help cargo accumulation near the negatively charged mammalian cell surface and their disulfide backbone helps intracellular cargo delivery via disulfide-exchange mechanisms with no apparent endosomal trapping. [19] In the cytoplasm, CPDs undergo rapid depolymerization (< 5min), ap rocess catalyzed by endogenous glutathione (GSH). At present, both non-covalent and covalent conjugations are available to append CPDs to proteins modified either genetically or chemically with suitable "tags" (i.e.h istidine tag).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell-Penetrating Poly(disulfide)s: The structures of cell-penetrating poly(disulfide)s (CPDs) is similar as polyarginine except the polypeptides backbone is replaced with poly(disulfide)s. [66,67] The CPDs were initially developed by Matile's group in 2013, which could be grown directly on the substrates by surfaceinitiated ring-opening disulfide-exchange polymerization method. [68,69] The polymer size could be adjusted by changing the polymerization time, initiator and monomer concentration.…”
Section: Synthetic Polymer-based Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of recombinant proteins including avidin, trans-cyclooctyne-BSA (TCO-BSA), TCO-anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) and BRD-4, either covalently or noncovalently conjugated with CPDs were successfully delivered into different mammalian cells via endocytosis-independent pathways. [67] Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry. Moreover, to avoid genetical or chemical modification of proteins which might affect their activities, recently, the same group reported two complementary CPD-facilitated approaches (post-translation modification (PTM)-based tagging and traceless tagging) for delivery of "native" proteins ( Figure 3b).…”
Section: Synthetic Polymer-based Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The formation of dynamic bonds constitutes a powerful strategy for the preparation of amphiphilic membrane transporters. 14,[19][20][21][22][23] Dynamic bonds such as hydrazones, oximes and disulfides offer two fundamental advantages for the synthesis of membrane carriers. [24][25][26][27][28] First, there is a synthetic advantage, because certain dynamic bonds (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the final internalization pathway of a given peptide is often promiscuous and depends on different parameters such as concentration, nature of the cargo and size of the corresponding supramolecular aggregates. 10,12 Furthermore, the highly dynamic processes involved in membrane transport such as counterion exchange 13,14 and membrane partitioning, strongly hinder the acquisition of robust data and the development of predictive models. 6,15 Additionally, the conformational changes of the transported peptides are difficult to discern and to study in real time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%