2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2218223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Uptake of Magnetic Nanoparticles Quantified by Magnetic Particle Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diamagnetic biological tissue and paramagnetic blood iron do not contribute to the MPS signal. 19 For measurement, a PCR tube typically containing 30-50 L sample volume was placed in the pick-up Copyright: American Scientific Publishers coil of the MPS system. During measurement, the sample was exposed to a sinusoidal oscillating magnetic field (variable amplitude B excit up to 25 mT, fixed frequency f excit of 25 kHz) and the non-linear magnetization response was detected (sensitivity: 5 · 10 12 Am 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diamagnetic biological tissue and paramagnetic blood iron do not contribute to the MPS signal. 19 For measurement, a PCR tube typically containing 30-50 L sample volume was placed in the pick-up Copyright: American Scientific Publishers coil of the MPS system. During measurement, the sample was exposed to a sinusoidal oscillating magnetic field (variable amplitude B excit up to 25 mT, fixed frequency f excit of 25 kHz) and the non-linear magnetization response was detected (sensitivity: 5 · 10 12 Am 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude of the third harmonic in the MPS signal, A 3 , allows for specific determination of SPIO iron amount without being affected by non-particular body iron. 19 Changes in the nonlinear response (as parameterized by the harmonic ratio A 5 /A 3 provide information on the magnetic characteristics of SPIO. 20 The present study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of MPS for VSOP quantification and for analysis of labeling efficacy in living THP-1 cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another technique called magnetic particle spectroscopy (MPS) or magnetization response spectroscopy, frequency and large amplitude is applied to IONPs and the non-linear magnetization response of IONPs in the presence of an oscillating magnetic field is monitored [ 167 ]. The MPS was recently utilized to quantify IONPs in Hela and Jurkat cells with the detection limits of 5 ng for Resovist, 50 ng for Ferraheme, and 100 ng for carboxydextran coated IONPs [ 168 ]. MPS measurements utilized small sample volumes (5 µL), allowed rapid measurements, and a high throughput screening (200 samples per hour).…”
Section: Quantification Of Ionpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, distinguishing free MNPs from those that are bound to cells. Strategies for probing the local environmental status of MNPs (e.g., bound vs. unbound) include detection of even, odd, and intermodulation frequencies [28-32], the use of ratios between harmonics[21, 33], rotational drift non-linearity [34] and magnetic particle spectroscopy (MPS) [35, 36]. MPS is a technique that uses a large applied field in order to measure a number of harmonic frequencies to determine a spectroscopic difference in the MNP response when MNPs are in a bound state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%