Volume 10: Petroleum Technology 2022
DOI: 10.1115/omae2022-80440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cement Sheath Integrity Evaluation Under Multiple Cyclic Loading Using Mechanical Equivalent Experiment for Gas Storage Wells in Eastern China

Abstract: Gas storage wells in eastern China have been in operation for nearly 30 years. Fatigue damage may have occurred in the cement sheath after years of injection-production cycles. If the risk of integrity failure of the cement sheath can be predicted accurately, optimization or remedial measures can be implemented over time to further prolong the life of gas storage wells. In this paper, we established a mechanical equivalent method to restore the wellbore load borne by the cement sheath to the self-developed wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study offered valuable insights into the impact of pressure on the mechanical properties of cement sheath interfaces. Su et al [18] developed a mechanical equivalence method to replicate the wellbore loading on the cement sheath using a self-designed wellbore simulator. Cyclic load tests were conducted, revealing a decrease in the tensile strength of the cement sheath following cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of this study offered valuable insights into the impact of pressure on the mechanical properties of cement sheath interfaces. Su et al [18] developed a mechanical equivalence method to replicate the wellbore loading on the cement sheath using a self-designed wellbore simulator. Cyclic load tests were conducted, revealing a decrease in the tensile strength of the cement sheath following cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%