1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Autologous Bone Grafting for Hip Dysplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The authors reported a high rate of failure, despite the small cover of the graft (mean 20.0%) with loosening of the cup in 18 of 36 hips (50%) and revision surgery in 7 of 36 hips (19.4%). Although the shortand mid-term results of cementless THA with a bone graft have been encouraging and similar to those of cemented THA with a bone graft, 14,24,[27][28][29][30][31] the long-term results may be worse than those for cemented THA with a bone graft. We believe that rapid and complete incorporation of the graft in cementless THA is more important than in cemented THA since there is no cement to provide early fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…6 The authors reported a high rate of failure, despite the small cover of the graft (mean 20.0%) with loosening of the cup in 18 of 36 hips (50%) and revision surgery in 7 of 36 hips (19.4%). Although the shortand mid-term results of cementless THA with a bone graft have been encouraging and similar to those of cemented THA with a bone graft, 14,24,[27][28][29][30][31] the long-term results may be worse than those for cemented THA with a bone graft. We believe that rapid and complete incorporation of the graft in cementless THA is more important than in cemented THA since there is no cement to provide early fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Numerous bone-grafting techniques have been reported, and autologous grafts have been found to be superior to homologous grafts. However, the amount of available autologous graft is limited, and homologous grafts often are used, particularly in revision procedures [2,6,10,20,21,24,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that all grafts had united at a mean follow-up of 11 years and no revisions were needed. Hasegawa et al 28 showed, in a series of 25 patients, that the grafted femoral head had incorporated seven months after surgery and had remodelled completely by 18 months, although the grafted bone had reduced in size significantly. Bal, Maurer and Harris 29 showed that a healed bulk graft which had been used at the primary operation provided valuable bone stock for the support of an acetabular component during revision THR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%