2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedex.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cementoblastoma previously misdiagnosed as fibrous dysplasia: Report of an uncommon case and discussion of the differential diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of the lesion involving more than one permanent tooth, as in the case reported here, is rare [3,[12][13][14]. Regardless of the number of teeth involved, the lesion is always associated with the dental root [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The occurrence of the lesion involving more than one permanent tooth, as in the case reported here, is rare [3,[12][13][14]. Regardless of the number of teeth involved, the lesion is always associated with the dental root [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Young adults who are under 30 years of age are most commonly affected [1,3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]17], with a slight male prevalence [2,3,9]. According to Brannon et al [2], 79.5% of tumors occur in the mandible, and in most cases, the lesion involves the first permanent molar [1,7,12,14,17]; in the few cases in which the upper jaw is affected, the maxillary sinus can be involved [3,13]. There are also reports of cementoblastoma associated with impacted [8,11,13] and deciduous teeth [3,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations