Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology Multimodal Haptic Feedback for Robotic Surgery

Juo, Yen-Yi; Abiri, Ahmad; Pensa, Jake; Sun, Songping; Tao, Anna; Bisley, James W.; Grundfest, Warren S.; Dutson, Erik

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814245-5.00017-7

Cited by 6 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cutaneous feeling originates from receptors located in the skin ( Figure A). It comprises of multiple types of sensors [ 50–52 ] : Slow‐adapting (SA) sensors are sensitive to low frequency mechanical stimulus down to 1 Hz and with a high spatial resolution, below 1 mm on fingertip, depending on a person's age and gender (Figure 4B) [ 53 ] and the location on the body (Figure 4C). [ 50 ] Fast‐adapting (FA) sensors are sensitive to higher frequency stimulus from tens of Hz up to 800 Hz [ 49 ] depending on the amplitude and the location, but with a much lower spatial resolution compared to SA sensors.…”

Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mechanoreceptors are located in muscles and tendons (Figure 4D). [ 52,61,62 ] Figure summarizes the requirements for different types of haptics. Due to lower force requirements and relatively simpler control for cutaneous haptics, more technologies have been developed for cutaneous haptics than for kinesthetic haptics, especially grounded kinesthetic haptics.…”

Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Integration of haptic feedback is essential, as explained by ref. [ 52 ]: “The effectiveness of any haptic feedback system relies on its ability to integrate with existing human neurosensory pathways”. There are two main areas of study for kinesthetic haptics: a) the hand, and b) the entire body.…”

Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback

Yin

Hinchet

Shea

et al. 2020

Adv Funct Materials

191

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) systems have garnered recent widespread attention due to increased accessibility, functionality, and affordability. These systems sense user inputs and typically provide haptic, audio, and visual feedback to blend interactive virtual environments with the real world for an enhanced or simulated reality experience. With applications ranging from immersive entertainment, to teleoperation, to physical therapy, further development of this technology has the potential for impact across multiple disciplines. However, VR/AR devices still face critical challenges that hinder integration into everyday life and additional applications; namely, the rigid and cumbersome form factor of current technology that is incompatible with the dynamic movements and pliable limbs of the human body. Recent advancements in the field of soft materials are uniquely suited to provide solutions to this challenge. Devices fabricated from flexible and elastic bio‐compatible materials have significantly greater compatibility with the human body and could lead to a more natural VR/AR experience. This review reports state‐of‐the‐art experimental studies in soft materials for wearable sensing and haptic feedback in VR/AR applications, explores emerging soft technologies for on‐body devices, and identifies current challenges and future opportunities toward seamless integration of the virtual and physical world.

show abstract

Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback

Yin

Hinchet

Shea

et al. 2020

Adv Funct Materials

191

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, it is particularly important for surgeons who use VR systems to conduct robot‐assisted surgeries. [ 210 ] Reports show that the force feedback system for robot‐assisted surgery provides information on the force exerted during teleoperation, and the absence of a force feedback system increases the error in surgery, thereby damaging the tissue by up to three times. [ 211,212 ] However, most haptic devices to date consist of straps, batteries, rigid actuators, complex wires, etc., which makes these devices very clunky with an appearance of a thick vests or gloves, which can cause discomfort.…”

Section: Nanowire‐based Wearable Skin Sensory Output Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanowire‐Based Soft Wearable Human–Machine Interfaces for Future Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications

Wang

Yap

Gong

et al. 2021

Adv Funct Materials

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A virtual world has now become a reality as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technology become commercially available. Similar to how humans interact with the physical world, AR and VR systems rely on human–machine interface (HMI) sensors to interact with the virtual world. Currently, this is achieved via state of‐the‐art wearable visual and auditory tools that are rigid, bulky, and burdensome, thereby causing discomfort during practical application. To this end, a skin sensory interface has the potential to serve as the next‐generation AR/VR technology because skin‐like wearable sensors have advantages in that they can be ultrathin, ultra‐soft, conformal, and imperceptible, which provides the ultimate comfort and immersive experience for users. In this progress report, nanowire‐based soft wearable HMI sensors including acoustic, strain, pressure sensors, and physiological sensors are reviewed that may be adopted as skin sensory inputs in future AR/VR systems. Further, nanowire‐based soft contact lenses, haptic force, and thermal and vibration actuators are covered as potential means of feedback for future AR/VR systems. Considering the possible effects of the virtual world on human health, skin‐like wearable artery pulses, glucose, and lactate sensors are also described, which may enable imperceptible health monitoring during future AR/VR practices.

show abstract

“…Tactile feedback provides feedback to users through the sense of touch using vibration, skin deformation, or small forces. Force feedback, or kinesthetic force feedback, simulates real-world physical touch using motorized motion or resistance rather than by fine touch [ 28 ]. Research on virtual rehabilitation can be categorized according to the use of fine motor tracking during upper limb rehabilitation, which is distinguished by the use of wearable or nonwearable devices.…”

Section: Technologies Used In Vr Rehabilitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Application of Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation in Stroke: Review of Technologies and Clinical Evidence

Kim

Cho²,

et al. 2020

JCM

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neurorehabilitation for stroke is important for upper limb motor recovery. Conventional rehabilitation such as occupational therapy has been used, but novel technologies are expected to open new opportunities for better recovery. Virtual reality (VR) is a technology with a set of informatics that provides interactive environments to patients. VR can enhance neuroplasticity and recovery after a stroke by providing more intensive, repetitive, and engaging training due to several advantages, including: (1) tasks with various difficulty levels for rehabilitation, (2) augmented real-time feedback, (3) more immersive and engaging experiences, (4) more standardized rehabilitation, and (5) safe simulation of real-world activities of daily living. In this comprehensive narrative review of the application of VR in motor rehabilitation after stroke, mainly for the upper limbs, we cover: (1) the technologies used in VR rehabilitation, including sensors; (2) the clinical application of and evidence for VR in stroke rehabilitation; and (3) considerations for VR application in stroke rehabilitation. Meta-analyses for upper limb VR rehabilitation after stroke were identified by an online search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed. We expect that this review will provide insights into successful clinical applications or trials of VR for motor rehabilitation after stroke.

show abstract

Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology Multimodal Haptic Feedback for Robotic Surgery

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback

Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback

Nanowire‐Based Soft Wearable Human–Machine Interfaces for Future Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications

Clinical Application of Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation in Stroke: Review of Technologies and Clinical Evidence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About