2000
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-00-01281-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centered $L_2$-discrepancy of random sampling and Latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper properties and construction of designs under a centered version of the L 2 -discrepancy are analyzed. The theoretic expectation and variance of this discrepancy are derived for random designs and Latin hypercube designs. The expectation and variance of Latin hypercube designs are significantly lower than that of random designs. While in dimension one the unique uniform design is also a set of equidistant points, low-discrepancy designs in higher dimension have to be generated by explici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we can build the relation between the computed discrepancy and the theoretical square discrepancy of LHS. In [16], the square discrepancy formula was represented as follows: …”
Section: Pairing Methods For 2-d Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we can build the relation between the computed discrepancy and the theoretical square discrepancy of LHS. In [16], the square discrepancy formula was represented as follows: …”
Section: Pairing Methods For 2-d Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 14 shows the calculated dimension using formula (16). The number of dimensions to apply to LDS increases, when the number of samples is not large enough.…”
Section: Pairing Methods For 2-d Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step, the maximum degradation tolerable for the final design, d t and the step-size ∆ used to conduct nested searches are initialized. A population of designs is then generated randomly or using DOE methods such as the Latin hypercube sampling or minimum discrepancy sequences [24]. Each individual in the population is first evaluated to obtain its nominal fitness.…”
Section: Begin Ea (For Maximization Problem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we consider the use of Design of Experiments (DOE) sampling approaches including Random Sampling (RS), Stratified Sampling (SS), and Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) [24][25][26] to generate m sampled design points as an approximation of the worst-case performance for a design in each of the k iterations (please refer to eq. (8)).…”
Section: Enhancing the Computational Efficiency Of Online Adaptive Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TA has been applied by Winker and Fang (1997a) to obtain lower bounds for the star-discrepancy, while Winker and Fang (1997b) use the approach to obtain low discrepancy U -type designs for the star-discrepancy. Fang et al (2000) extended the analysis to several modifications of the L 2 -discrepancy, while Fang et al (2002) and Fang et al (2003) consider the centered and wrap-around L 2 -discrepancy. Here, we use settings from Fang et al (2003) for the empirical demonstration of the formal framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%