2020
DOI: 10.18231/j.ijceo.2020.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma suspects in a south Indian population. Is it time for “corneal anthropology”?

Abstract: To study correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in the primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects and to assess the importance of the local population reference CCT in pachymetry adjusted IOP. Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients aged 40-70 years of age diagnosed as POAG suspects were included. CCT measurements using ultrasound pachymetry and IOP measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was done. IOP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Sharma et al, found a moderate positive connection between CCT and IOP, statistically significant for both the right and left eyes (p = 0.001). 10 Positive correlation between CCT and IOP was also found by other researchers. [11][12][13][14] Non-contact tonometry (NCT), which was used in our study is known to have a reasonable correlation with CCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…6 Sharma et al, found a moderate positive connection between CCT and IOP, statistically significant for both the right and left eyes (p = 0.001). 10 Positive correlation between CCT and IOP was also found by other researchers. [11][12][13][14] Non-contact tonometry (NCT), which was used in our study is known to have a reasonable correlation with CCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The difference between both groups was insignificant. Similarly, Sharma et al [9] in their study observed 58 males and 42 females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Similarly, Mbatuegwu et al [8] found that the mean measured IOP was 16.77±4.37 mmHg. Furthermore, Sharma et al [9] found that the mean IOP in Indian CCT corrected group was 19.76±2.81 mmHg and in international CCT group was 21.51±2.83 mmHg. Levene's test indicated significant difference in mean IOP of 2 groups (p=0.000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[ 9 ] Another study from a nearby urban region (Bangalore, Karnataka) found similar CCT values and significantly lower than the internationally accepted CCT value (545 mm). [ 10 ] The authors suggested the use of local ethnic group CCT to ascertain the pachymetry-corrected IOP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%