2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central CRH administration changes formalin pain responses in male and female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies have attempted to reconcile these differences, with significant progress. For example, Lariviere et al (2011) revealed differential effects of central CRF on distinct behavioral responses in the formalin test. Additionally, with the development of more selective pharmacological tools for distinguishing specific CRF receptor-subtype function, recent work suggests that the central anti-nociceptive effects of CRF are most likely mediated through CRF 2 receptors (Ji and Neugebauer, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies have attempted to reconcile these differences, with significant progress. For example, Lariviere et al (2011) revealed differential effects of central CRF on distinct behavioral responses in the formalin test. Additionally, with the development of more selective pharmacological tools for distinguishing specific CRF receptor-subtype function, recent work suggests that the central anti-nociceptive effects of CRF are most likely mediated through CRF 2 receptors (Ji and Neugebauer, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRF administration was shown to cause analgesia during the interphase of pain stimulation by formalin application, but did not show an effect during the first or second phase of this test (Vit et al., ). Antinociceptive effects of CRF administration during the interphase of the formalin test were also demonstrated in male and female rats (Lariviere et al., ), which indicates that CRF is antinociceptive by activating descending pain inhibitory circuits to the spinal cord. However, rats showed an increase in licking behaviour during the first and second phases of the test, indicating a hyperalgesic effect of CRF during these phases (Lariviere et al., ).…”
Section: Crfmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, in the past decade, the role of CRF in the CNS in pain and analgesia gained increasing attention. It has become clear that the peptide has pleiotropic effects: it can induce analgesia but in some rodent pain models opposite, hyperalgesic effects of CRF have been shown (Bourbia et al., ; Lariviere et al., ). To substantiate the significance of forebrain CRF in pain behaviour, we will first discuss the CNS effects of CRF and CRF (receptor) antagonists on pain behaviour.…”
Section: Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, evidences showed that NO and ONOO − facilitate PGE 2 -induced hyperalgesia, but has lower hyperalgesic action when acting alone (Ndengele et al, 2008). The injection of dilute formalin produces a persistent biphasic nociceptive stimulation noted by the behavioral pain responses of licking, flexing and jerking of the injected paw (Lariviere et al, 2011). The early phase of response (within 0-5 min after injection) comprises the neurogenic pain, while the late phase (within 15-60 min after injection) comprises the inflammatory pain (hyperalgesia) (Lapa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%