Central European MEPs and Their Roles: Behavioral Strategies in the European Parliament

Abstract

This article helps to better understand the role orientations of the Central European Members of the European Parliament, the factors that influence their strategies, and the relationship between their roles and activities. Based on the results of a quantitative survey research with MEPs from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia in the 2009-2014 term, I argue that it is possible to explain the political roles of MEPs by their attitudes towards politics and policy, and the territorial focus of representation (European vs. national level). Due to the internal mechanisms of the EP and its position in the multilevel governance system of European politics, these two dimensions represent dilemmas that all MEPs face, when it comes to the efficient use of their scarce resources: time and energy. This study demonstrates that socio-demographic factors, attitudes and political socialization all have an influence on what roles MEPs choose. The time spent in the EP, age, previous political experience, party affiliation, left-right self-definition and career ambitions are all important factors that can explain the political behavior of MEPs. The Central European MEPs' focus on politics vs. policy and the European vs. national political arena have different roots, and different variables explain them. Orientation towards politics and policy largely depends on previous political experience and future career ambitions. Focus on the European or the national level is best explained by age, party affiliation and left-right self-definition.

Organized for Parliament? Explaining the Electoral Success of Radical Right Parties in Post-Communist Europe

“…One is a strong statist position on economic issues, expressed in condemnation of privatization and calls to re-nationalize recently privatized industries (Ghodsee 2008: 36). The pro-state position of radical right parties is also protectionist: that their own nation should be put first – for example, to ‘buy Hungarian’ – and can therefore be labelled economic nationalism (Bíró-Nagy and Róna 2013: 8–9). Furthermore, radical right parties in post-communist Europe share a clear anti-establishment attitude.…”