1947
DOI: 10.1016/0096-6347(47)90315-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central myxoma of the jaw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] Some authors had previously associated its origin with a myxomatous change of an odontogenic fibroma or residual foci of embryonic tissue. [4] Based on the information gathered from the available literature, it is still somewhat arguable whether OM is truly an odontogenic neoplasm. However, its histological similarity to the stellate reticulum of a developing tooth, its exclusive occurrence in close proximity to the tooth-bearing parts of the jaws, the occasional association with a missing or an unerupted tooth, the presence of odontogenic epithelium in a minority of cases, and the fact that it rarely appears in other parts of the skeleton offer support to an odontogenic origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11] Some authors had previously associated its origin with a myxomatous change of an odontogenic fibroma or residual foci of embryonic tissue. [4] Based on the information gathered from the available literature, it is still somewhat arguable whether OM is truly an odontogenic neoplasm. However, its histological similarity to the stellate reticulum of a developing tooth, its exclusive occurrence in close proximity to the tooth-bearing parts of the jaws, the occasional association with a missing or an unerupted tooth, the presence of odontogenic epithelium in a minority of cases, and the fact that it rarely appears in other parts of the skeleton offer support to an odontogenic origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] It was first described by Rudolf Virchow as myxofibroma in 1863 and was later renamed as odontogenic myxoma by Thoma and Goldman in 1947. [34] OM appears to originate from the dental papilla, follicle, or periodontal ligament. The evidence for its odontogenic origin arises from its almost exclusive location in the tooth-bearing areas of the jaws, its occasional association with missing or unerupted teeth, and the presence of odontogenic epithelium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odontogenic myxoma was originally described by Thoma and Goldman in 1947 . It is considered a rare benign neoplasm with probable origin from the odontogenic ectomesenchyme .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its original description by Thoma and Goldman in 1947,[3] the nature of OM has been a matter of controversy. Several studies have been performed in order to define its precise nature, but at present there is no universally accepted theory about its probable histogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%