Central Venous Access Ports Placed by Interventional Radiologists: Experience with 125 Consecutive Patients

Lorch, Heike; Zwaan, M.; Kagel, C.; Weiss, H.-D.

doi:10.1007/s002700001721

Cited by 117 publications

(99 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We have seen malposition only one patient who underwent jugular approach. The port infection rate in the related literature ranges from 2.6% to 9% [3,14]. There was no procedure early related infection observed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is an increased risk of pneumothorax in patients who have a severe emphysema, bullous lung and acute respiratory distress syndrome. A "pinch off syndrome" may occur in ports placed through the subclavian vein secondary to the pinching of the port catheter between the clavicle and first rib leading to catheter fracture [14,16]. The catheter was broken in one patient and migrated to the right ventricle (0.7%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports:Subclavian Versus Juguler Access

Karamustafaoğlu¹,

Yağcı²,

Koçal³

et al. 2013

Ann Clin Anal Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anahtar KelimelerSantral Venöz Girişim, İmplante Edilebilir Port, Eksternal Juguler Ven, Subklavyen Ven. AbstractAim: Today, implantable central venous ports (ICVP) are increasingly used in oncology patients and provide easy vascular access for delivery of chemotherapy, other intravenous treatments, as fluids, blood products and parenteral nutrition solutions. In this study, we present our experience and comparison of efficacy and incidence of complications between subclavian versus jugular access in oncology patients and provide easy vascular access for delivery of chemotherapy. Material and Method: Three hundred ten implantable central venous ports (ICVP) were implanted via the subclavian vein (SV) in 145 patients (66 men, 79 women) with average age of 56.55 (18-86) and were implanted via the external jugular vein (EJV) in 165 patients (75 men, 90 women) with average age of 56

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports:Subclavian Versus Juguler Access

Karamustafaoğlu¹,

Yağcı²,

Koçal³

et al. 2013

Ann Clin Anal Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Landmark-mark based punctures of the subclavian vein in particular were associated with increased rates of pneumothorax (11,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). In addition, infection rates were lower for ultrasound-guided approaches with the Seldinger technique (1.1-8.8%) (3,11,13,18,19) compared with surgical cut-down (0.8-16.3%) (10,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Moreover, the radiological technique does not require general anesthesia and is cost effective (26).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience

Jonczyk

Gebauer

Rotzinger

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[11,12] Bizim çalışmamızda erken dönemde (ilk 1 hafta içinde) hiçbir hastada infeksiyon gelişmezken, geç dönem-de (26. haftada) sadece bir hastada cep infeksiyonu gelişti ve port kateter çıkarıldı. Erken dönemde çok düşük (sıfıra yakın) olan infeksiyon oranında girişimin tamamen steril koşullar sağlanmış kalp-damar cerrahisi ameliyathanelerinde yapılmasının etkili olduğu düşünüldü.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Port catheter implantation under scopy in hybrid operation rooms

Bayrak¹

2012

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, kardiyovasküler cerrahi ünitelerinde son yıllarda hızla artan şekilde oluşturulan ve yeni açı-lımlara neden olan hibrid ameliyathanelerde yapılan port kateter implantasyon sonuçları değerlendirildi. Ça lış ma pla nı: Bu çalışmaya Kasım 2008 -Aralık 2010 tarihleri arasında hastanemiz hematoloji ünitesinde çeşitli patolojiler nedeniyle yatan ve tedavileri sırasında port kateter implantasyonu yapılan 54 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların tamamına kalp damar cerrahisi hibrid ameliyathanesinde intravenöz sedasyon ve lokal anestezi altında, skopi eşliğinde port kateter takılması işlemi uygulandı. Bul gu lar: İşlemin başarı oranı %100 olarak hesaplanırken, işleme bağlı majör komplikasyon gelişmedi. Yalnızca bir hastada lokal hematom saptandı, uzun dönemde ise bir hastada tromboz gözlendi. Bir hastada ise geç dönemde lokal enfeksiyon saptandı. So nuç:Subkutan venöz portların kalp ve damar cerrahisi ameliyathanelerinde skopi altında implantasyonu, literatürde bildirilen klasik cerrahi olgu serileriyle karşılaştırıl-dığında daha düşük komplikasyon oranı ile gerçekleştiri-lebilmektedir.Anah tar söz cük ler: Hibrid ameliyathane; malignite; port kateter; skopi.

show abstract

Central Venous Access Ports Placed by Interventional Radiologists: Experience with 125 Consecutive Patients

Abstract: Percutaneous implantation of central venous port systems is safe and easy to perform. Complication rates of this study compare favorably with those of other radiological and surgical series.

Cited by 117 publications

References 14 publications

Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports:Subclavian Versus Juguler Access

Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports:Subclavian Versus Juguler Access

Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience

Port catheter implantation under scopy in hybrid operation rooms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About