2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9954-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference and the effect of venous hyperoxia: A limiting factor, or an additional marker of severity in shock?

Abstract: Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PCO) has demonstrated its prognostic value in critically ill patients suffering from shock, and current expert recommendations advocate for further resuscitation interventions when PCO is elevated. PCO combination with arterial-venous oxygen content difference (PCO/CO) seems to enhance its performance when assessing anaerobic metabolism. However, the fact that PCO values might be altered by changes in blood O content (the Haldane effect), has been presented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the absence of correlation between P va CO 2 changes and S cv O 2 suggests that the Haldane effect has only a minor impact on the changes of P va CO 2 during fluid bolus. Given that arterial saturation and PCO 2 did not change in our cohort increases in S cv O 2 secondary to a positive fluid response could cause an increase in venous partial pressure of CO 2 and consequently an increase in P va CO 2 [34].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Second, the absence of correlation between P va CO 2 changes and S cv O 2 suggests that the Haldane effect has only a minor impact on the changes of P va CO 2 during fluid bolus. Given that arterial saturation and PCO 2 did not change in our cohort increases in S cv O 2 secondary to a positive fluid response could cause an increase in venous partial pressure of CO 2 and consequently an increase in P va CO 2 [34].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 68%
“…8 10 A high ∆PCO 2 /∆tO 2 ratio, with cut-offs of ≥1.8, ≥1.6 or ≥1.68 mm Hg/mL have been associated with a worse prognosis. [8][9][10] Although the routine use of this ratio in critical care is controversial, 22 the narrow difference in the cut-offs make it imperative to understand the various influences on blood gas parameters, to be applied during clinical interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that, in patients with circulatory shock, ventilation at 100% inspired oxygen fraction (FiO 2 ) for 5 min increased venous PCO 2 , and hence the Pv-aCO 2 gap, independent of changes in the hemodynamic status [44]. While this observation may be explained by a lower CO 2 affinity of hemoglobin due to elevated venous PO 2 (Haldane effect) [44], it may also reflect some impairment in microcirculatory blood flow, owing to the vasoconstrictive effects of hyperoxia [45]. The second confounder is acute hyperventilation with respiratory alkalosis.…”
Section: Pitfalls In the Interpretation Of The Pv-aco 2 Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%