2002
DOI: 10.1007/s000120200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrality and connectors in Maltsev categories

Abstract: We develop a new approach to the classical property of centrality of equivalence relations. The internal notion of connector allows to clarify classical results in Maltsev varieties and to extend them in the more general context of regular Maltsev categories, hence including the important new examples of Maltsev quasivarieties and of topological Maltsev algebras. We also prove that Maltsev categories can be characterized in terms of a property of connectors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So it is a Birkhoff subcategory of C, and then the adjunction (1) in Section 1 gives rise to an admissible Galois structure¯ 1 = ((C, E), (C Ab , Z), F U), as proved in the Theorem 3.5. In order to characterize the coverings relative to¯ 1 the following result will be needed (it extends Proposition 5.3 in [6]): Proposition 4.5 Let C be a regular Mal'cev category such that any regular epimorphism is effective for descent. If R is an equivalence relation on A with [R, ∇ A ] = A , there exists an abelian object Q in C such that R is canonically isomorphic to A × Q.…”
Section: Be a Centralizing Relation On R[ F ] And ∇ A Let Us Considmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So it is a Birkhoff subcategory of C, and then the adjunction (1) in Section 1 gives rise to an admissible Galois structure¯ 1 = ((C, E), (C Ab , Z), F U), as proved in the Theorem 3.5. In order to characterize the coverings relative to¯ 1 the following result will be needed (it extends Proposition 5.3 in [6]): Proposition 4.5 Let C be a regular Mal'cev category such that any regular epimorphism is effective for descent. If R is an equivalence relation on A with [R, ∇ A ] = A , there exists an abelian object Q in C such that R is canonically isomorphic to A × Q.…”
Section: Be a Centralizing Relation On R[ F ] And ∇ A Let Us Considmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proposition 4.3[6] Let R and S be two equivalence relations on an object X in C, and let f :X → Y be a regular epimorphism in C. If [R, S] = X , then [ f (R), f (S)] = Y .Lemma 4.4Let C be a regular Mal'cev category. Given f : A → B and p : E → B regular epimorphisms in C, let us consider the following pullback:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When [R, S] = 0, then R ∩S is abelian. Since C is Mal'cev, when we have R ∩ S = X , then R and S are necessarily connected [7]. p(y, x, z)) makes d 0 a (necessarily abelian) group object in C/X.…”
Section: Mal'cev Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where l R and r S are the sections induced by the maps s 0,R and s 0,S underlying the reflexivity of R and S. Let us recall the following definition, see [7], and also [11]: DEFINITION 3.1. Given any Mal'cev category C, a connector on the pair (R, S) of equivalence relations on an object X in C is a morphism p(x, y, z) which satisfies the identities: p(x, y, y) = x and p(y, y, z) = z.…”
Section: Mal'cev Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect of modular varieties is that they admit a good theory of commutators of congruences [7], [10], [11], [16]. Any congruence is an internal reflexive graph, actually a groupoid, and the importance of internal categorical structures in commutator theory has been pointed out in various recents papers [3], [4], [6], [12], [13], [18], [19], [20]. The purpose of this paper is to prove some properties of these internal structures which make it possible to characterize important classes of modular varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%