2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-004-1876-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special reflexive graphs in modular varieties

Abstract: We investigate a special kind of reflexive graph in any congruence modular variety. When the variety is Maltsev these special reflexive graphs are exactly the internal groupoids, when the variety is distributive they are the internal reflexive relations. We use these internal structures to give some characterizations of Maltsev, distributive and arithmetical varieties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since C is a Birkhoff subcategory in Eq(C), thanks to Theorem 3.5 the adjunction (2) gives rise to an admissible Galois structure. P Example 5.2 When V is a Mal'cev variety the category Gpd(V) of internal groupoids in V is a Mal'cev variety as well ( [12,20]); therefore Eq(V), that is a full reflective subcategory of Gpd(V) closed in it under subobjects, turns out to be a quasi-variety in a Mal'cev variety. In this situation the effective descent morphisms in V are exactly the regular epimorphisms, and then (Eq(V), V) gives rise to an admissible Galois structure by Proposition 5.1.…”
Section: Coverings Of Internal Equivalence Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since C is a Birkhoff subcategory in Eq(C), thanks to Theorem 3.5 the adjunction (2) gives rise to an admissible Galois structure. P Example 5.2 When V is a Mal'cev variety the category Gpd(V) of internal groupoids in V is a Mal'cev variety as well ( [12,20]); therefore Eq(V), that is a full reflective subcategory of Gpd(V) closed in it under subobjects, turns out to be a quasi-variety in a Mal'cev variety. In this situation the effective descent morphisms in V are exactly the regular epimorphisms, and then (Eq(V), V) gives rise to an admissible Galois structure by Proposition 5.1.…”
Section: Coverings Of Internal Equivalence Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us observe that the theory of central extensions can not be applied in the study of the Galois structure¯ 2 , since Eq(C) is not exact, in general. Particularly interesting is the case when C is a Mal'cev variety, because in this case Eq(C) is a quasi-variety in the Mal'cev variety Gpd(C) of internal groupoids in C ( [12,20]). As a last application we consider the Galois structure¯ induced by the following composite adjunction:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%